My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENT 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:44:04 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:18:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
high-density units, defined in the General Plan as eight or more units per acre, including <br /> small zero-lot-line homes, two mobile home parks, major apartment locations that are <br /> the higher-density units, and the senior apartment complexes at Ridge View Commons <br /> and Stanley Boulevard. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen stated that the Alternatives planning process started with the <br /> assistance of David Gates, urban designer, in terms of the structural elements. He <br /> explained that these elements are the varied, most basic components of the site that <br /> guide how it would ultimately be developed in the future, such as the major constraints, <br /> the opportunities, and what the General Plan says ought to be there. He indicated that <br /> these consist primarily of the open space, which is primarily undevelopable and owned <br /> by Zone 7; the extension of El Charro Road down through the middle of the site and <br /> connecting to Stanley Boulevard to the south, as shown in the General Plan; and the <br /> extension of Busch Road to connect to El Charro Road, as also shown in the General <br /> Plan. He noted that these two are very important to the outlying City area in the hope of <br /> reducing traffic in the neighborhood. He added that the General Plan also provides a <br /> list of potential land uses for the potentially developable area, consisting of the major <br /> categories of residential of various densities, commercial, industrial, office, and public. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen then displayed a development grid of the area, together with some <br /> alternatives, prepared by the designers to illustrate typical large block lengths and <br /> widths and give a sense how the street system might begin to look if this area were to <br /> be developed with residential and potentially other uses extending into it. He continued <br /> that the designers then went into curvilinear streets to give a sense of scale as to where <br /> the future major streets within the development would be expected to go, based <br /> primarily on distances, and the location for potential major drainage ways. He indicated <br /> that there are two major developers involved with this: the property at the lowest portion <br /> of the site, right at Valley Avenue and Busch Road, will have to drain to the west, which <br /> leads to a discussion about having a detention pond and entry area into the <br /> development; and the Lionstone property, which has a contractual approval with Zone 7 <br /> in conjunction with the dedication of Cope Lake to Zone 7, and its water would have to <br /> drain through a swale or some other drainage facility of that sort before entering into <br /> Cope Lake. He stated that envisioning a couple of waterways extending through the <br /> site, the scale of the major street systems, and these other givens and constraints really <br /> helps to give a sense as to how the land use planning will ultimately, probably need to <br /> go. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen then displayed a slide showing where key community components such <br /> as parks, buffers, greenways, and such might go. He reiterated that 22 acres are <br /> privately owned and in the APA so they could only be used for office, retail, or industrial. <br /> He indicated that, given the input from the project economists and all the retail located <br /> mostly in Livermore, plus the 11 acres planned in Pleasanton, the thinking has been <br /> that this would not be marketable as a large-scale retail use, so that was removed from <br /> consideration. He added that as it would not be appropriate to locate industrial right <br /> next to the residential, what is left is office; and being close to the freeway, it is <br /> considered to be the best office land for the plan area because of that access. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 22, 2013 Page 5 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.