01 - Laserfiche WebLink

benefits and impacts mentioned by Councilmember Narum, he noted that residential cost impacts are lower in Hacienda because of the existing infrastructure and commercial cost benefits are higher because there is none of the attendant infrastructure and maintenance for the city. Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio asked Mr. Paxson to expand upon a comment he made to her earlier that day, which was that because Hacienda is a transit oriented development and what he termed a functional PDA, it somehow limits the impacts of RHNA. Mr. Paxson explained that it has largely to do with the fair share factors, in that there is a lesser negative effect when employment occurs within areas considered PDAs that are proximate to transit. For the purposes of the last RHNA calculation, Hacienda was considered a PDA. Councilmember Brown asked what Hacienda's current vacancy rate is. Mr. Paxson referred to Hacienda's website, but estimated between 14% and 16%. Becky Dennis referred to an analysis she submitted to staff. She said her issue is not with whether Hacienda should be allowed to keep the square footage in question, in fact she felt they could perhaps use additional square footage, but with the actual need for affordable housing in areas below the median income. She recommended that the Council postpone a decision until after the upcoming fee setting exercise, which is in part aimed at making housing a draw for businesses. She said her understanding was that a decision had not been made regarding the cap before because there was a desire to retain the office entitlements should the residential sites never be developed as such. She again asked the Council to wait on a decision and in the interim engage commercial property owners in identifying a solution to the underlying issue, which is that the housing being generated creates a need for more affordability than is available within each development. She said she believed that rather than jobs and housing centers, the model of the future would based more on a self-contained principality. She also said she saw no reason for the Council to take action with regards to California Center, as Hacienda is now in control of that project. David Miller thanked Mr. Dolan for his attempts to explain RHNA but said he still lacked a clear understanding of the actual impacts. He said his primary concern relates to schools and, while he dreads the overcrowding that will result from these developments, he is also disappointed to see that fewer units than were envisioned will be built and subsequently less fees will be generated. He recommended that staff include some statement regarding the impact on RHNA in its staff reports. Greg O'Connor acknowledged that RHNA methodology changes from time to time but agreed with the Mayor that when you create jobs, you also create a need for housing. He read a letter he had intended to submit •:o staff, which focused on the imminent surpassing of the city's existing housing cap. He felt that restoring Hacienda's commercial development capacity would only add to the city's RHNA requirements, all without consideration of the commercial allocations eminent in the East Pleasanton Specific Plan and other infill projects. By his calculations, the additional 930,000 square feet proposed for Hacienda represents approximately 5,283 jobs and 3,522 residential units. He said it was unfortunate this data was not made available to the Planning Commission and asked that the Council send the item back to the Commission for reconsideration based on this new infrmation. He alternatively asked that the Council deny the staff recommendation if it feels the need to make a decision tonight. Heidi Fielding said she is happy to see the city supporting increased residential development in Hacienda, and hoped it could do so while retaining Pleasanton's wonderful character. With regards to cash flow, she questioned whether staff factored in the revenue stream generated by multi-family family residences. She said there has been considerable discussion about affordable and single-family residential development, but asked that they not forget about middle income families in calculating City Council Minutes Page 8 of 12 September 17, 2013