Laserfiche WebLink
allocation. This leaves approximately 525,000 square feet of unallocated development <br />between both the Pre -1993 and Post 1993 properties. Going forward, with the cap held <br />at 9,889,000 square feet, exempting the aforementioned housing sites will allow <br />approximately 900,000 square feet of office to be distributed elsewhere in the park. If <br />the approved residential projects on the sites are not constructed, the previous office <br />allocation would remain as before on the sites. <br />CHANGES TO FUTURE TRACKING OF DEVELOPMENT AGAINST THE CAP <br />Continuing to track development in Hacienda with two separate property groups limits <br />the flexibility of future development and involves a cumbersome system that makes <br />development approvals difficult. Staff will work with the Hacienda Owners Association <br />to develop a method of calculating a development's change to the remaining square <br />footage regardless of the Pre /Post- 1993 property designation. This will allow for an <br />easier and clearer discussion regarding the development's impact on the cap in the <br />future. This recommendation will be brought back to the City Council at a later date. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />In 2012, the City Council certified a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) <br />and adopted the CEQA Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the <br />Housing Element update and Climate Action Plan General Plan Amendment and <br />Rezonings. This SEIR was a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) <br />prepared for the Pleasanton 2005 -2025 General Plan which was certified in July 2009. <br />In the SEIR development potential for the seven sites discussed in this staff report was <br />assumed to include both any approved or allocated commercial development as well as <br />residential development assumed in the Housing Element project, in addition to the full <br />build out of Hacienda. <br />CEQA specifies that development projects, such as these sites, that are proposed <br />pursuant to the requirements of an adopted SEIR that has been prepared and certified <br />are exempt from additional environmental review provided: (1) there are no substantial <br />changes to the project or to the circumstances under which the project is being <br />undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or that substantially <br />increase the severity of previously identified effects; or (2) that no new information of <br />substantial importance which was not known at the time the previous EIR was certified <br />shows the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR. <br />The proposed PUD major modification would allow the exemption from the development <br />cap of residential development on seven sites, thus increasing the amount of residential <br />development allowed in Hacienda. The project analyzed in the SEIR included both <br />residential and non - residential development on the seven Hacienda sites, and the <br />impact analysis, mitigations, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program accounts <br />for this development. Thus, staff recommends this project be reviewed without any <br />additional CEQA review or process. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Staff received public comment from James Paxson and Martin Inderbitzen in a meeting <br />held on August 14, 2013. Staff received the attached letter (Exhibit G) from James <br />Paxson on August 22, 2013. <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />