My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
091713
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2013 12:22:22 PM
Creation date
9/12/2013 4:21:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/17/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HACIENDA PUD AND DEVELOPMENT CAP <br />Hacienda was established using the PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance, which <br />recognizes that conditions change over time, including City policy and direction, market <br />and economic conditions and property owner plans. The Zoning Ordinance establishes <br />a PUD modification process that enables changes to a PUD. <br />Hacienda was originally developed in two phases. Phase 1 was established with <br />PUD -81 -30 and covered 573 acres. Phase 2 was established with PUD -85 -08 and <br />covered 260 acres. These two PUD's have undergone numerous changes since their <br />creation. The changes have ranged from small alterations to an individual site plan or <br />architecture, to major modifications that address the requirements of the entire project. <br />Previous Major Modifications have addressed issues relating to FAR, residential uses <br />and the amount of development allowed within Hacienda (the limit or cap on <br />development). <br />Although limits on development have existed since Hacienda's first PUD, the first <br />numerical development cap was set in 1987 and had a not -to- exceed total square <br />footage of 11,755,000 square feet. Subsequent modifications to the PUDs reduced the <br />square footage down to its current cap of 9,889,000 square feet. Reductions in <br />Hacienda's cap have occurred twice and were made at the same time as other changes <br />were made to the PUD. The cap was reduced by 1.4 million square feet in 1992 when <br />79 acres of land was rezoned to High Density Residential and reduced in 1993 by <br />500,000 square feet when changes were made to allowed uses within the development. <br />However, rezoning to residential or changing the allowed uses has not always included a <br />reduction in the cap. There are examples of modifications made to the Hacienda PUD <br />when areas were changed to residential without lowering the cap. In 1990, Ordinance <br />1456 modified the PUD to allow 12.4 acres to be changed to high density residential and <br />the cap remained unchanged. In 1994 FAR's in the Park were increased by <br />Ordinance 1637 and the cap remained unchanged. <br />What is important to note about the recent PUD modifications is the fact that, while the <br />2011 and 2012 PUD Modifications allowed for the development of High Density <br />Residential, the modifications to the PUDs did not specifically address the relationship of <br />that development with the development cap. The development cap described in the <br />Hacienda PUD excludes residential construction. Ordinance 1596, adopted June 15, <br />1993, states that all residential areas should be excluded from the calculation of the <br />9,889,000 square feet as follows: <br />Total Gross Floor Area within the Project shall not exceed nine million, eight <br />hundred eighty -nine thousand (9,889,000) square feet, excluding residential <br />areas, child day -care facilities, transit/public service center facilities, and BART <br />stations and related facilities." <br />However, it is unclear if that language was intended to apply only to the existing and <br />proposed residential projects in 1993, or if it was intended to apply to future residential <br />development in Hacienda. Staff is recommending, based on its review and the <br />environmental impact analysis that assumes the housing element approved residential <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.