My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
091713
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2013 12:21:45 PM
Creation date
9/12/2013 3:42:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/17/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Diamond stated that the City does have a database that includes the <br />120 documented units, and staff did a survey a couple years ago. She noted that the <br />Housing Division is planning on getting a workshop together to assist the property <br />owners in the hope that they will rent out their units. She added that occupancy is hard <br />to document as it changes over time. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that she is envisioning a long -term scenario, possibly like a <br />project such as Pleasanton Gateway coming forward that actually builds out with a <br />strategy that, as part of the sales process, the owner can build a second unit, and so it <br />is zoned for that and plans are prepared. She inquired if they would potentially be <br />required to pay fees, such as school impact fees and traffic mitigation fees, up front. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. <br />Commissioner Allen inquired what the development across from the Pleasanton <br />Gateway development that has second units is called and whether these second units, <br />and how many there are, are included in the 120 units counted. <br />Ms. Stern replied the Walnut Hills and Canyon Oaks both have second units and that <br />there are about 20 or 30 second units in those two developments. <br />Ms. Diamond noted that in the survey that went out a couple years ago, there was only <br />a 25- or 30- percent response rate, so staff does not really know how many units are <br />rented out. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that she got excited when she first read the staff report, <br />thinking this is a great opportunity and part of the strategy around affordable housing <br />and an important thing to do. She continued that she is wondering now, if it is hard to <br />count these, there are so few, and most of them are not really being used in a way that <br />helps the City meet its RHNA numbers, if this should really be a strategy today that is <br />part of that Housing Element if it is not getting the City what it wants, if this is the right <br />time to do this or not. She stated that she hates to spend a lot of cost trying to track <br />120 units with the turnover and everything else and to try to get a few units to count <br />toward the City's RHNA numbers. <br />Ms. Stern stated that the City does the survey for its own edification and generally, the <br />housing program has done it when it had an intern available to do it, so it is not a great <br />deal of cost involved. She agreed that it is not going to add a lot but that there are <br />different strategies. She added that the State likes to see the City putting its effort into a <br />number of different ways to satisfy its housing needs, and this is one way that to do it. <br />Following up on Commissioner Allen's question about the developer having to pay for <br />all of the traffic and school impact fees, Commissioner O'Connor inquired if an individual <br />who decides ten years after moving into his home that he wants to build a second unit in <br />his back yard would have to go through those same steps as far as traffic analysis. <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 14, 2013 Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.