My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
091713
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2013 12:21:45 PM
Creation date
9/12/2013 3:42:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/17/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tools to be able to do that. She noted that the City currently has a very low level of <br />renting out so it is a little difficult for the City to justify second units being in an affordable <br />housing category. She further noted that the City is putting more effort into this to be <br />able to count more of these units towards its RHNA numbers. <br />Mr. Dolan noted that in order to count these units, income restrictions may be imposed <br />similar to those for the other units, which makes it a little more complicated. He <br />indicated that there are other communities such as Piedmont that have such limited <br />opportunity to provide any affordable housing that they negotiate during their Housing <br />Element process that this is one of their main sources of affordable housing. He added <br />that this makes it a little easier for them to meet their RHNA numbers with second units. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that some of the second units are 500 square feet, or <br />600 or 700, and just by their sheer size, they are going to be lower cost to rent. He <br />inquired if these units cannot be counted just because of their sizes, even if they were <br />vacant, because it would have to be verified that they have a lower income on those <br />units. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that the City has a RHNA number that it needs to meet, so it has to <br />speculate how many units it needs to meet that number. He noted that the City does <br />not have a great track record with a total of 120 units over several years, such that even <br />if all of them were occupied, it would still be a pretty weak case to count all of these as <br />providing a great source of affordable housing. He added that these second units are <br />actually providing some affordable housing because they are less expensive than <br />renting the house in the front, but while it is a good thing to have, it is hard to prove that <br />to the State. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that it appears that some of the other regulations that <br />were brought up here tonight make it difficult to count these second units toward <br />affordable housing; for example, if an owner who has two units but lives in one of them <br />in order to have that second unit rented out, moves away, the two houses could not be <br />rented out, and one cannot be counted as affordable because that is not allowed. He <br />inquired if the entire property would have to be rented out to one family. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. She added that the idea would be to sustain the general, <br />single - family neighborhood character. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that it would be nice to know why some of the 120 units <br />are not rented out, if maybe a family member is living there, or it might just also be <br />vacant for whatever reason. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he thinks it is just a personal choice: they buy a house and say it <br />would be great to have a second unit, to have the au pair live there. He added that <br />when it comes right down to it, they do not want someone else living there. <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 14, 2013 Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.