CCMIN060413 - Laserfiche WebLink

strongly that less is more and therefore supported something like option 1. He agreed the demolition should be addressed and said he would like to the second definition provided by staff expanded a bit further. He said he would also like to see the task force come forward with one cocument that marries and clarifies the policies and guidelines spelled out within the Downtown Specific Plan, design guidelines and Historical Context Statement. He also thought the flow chart would be critical in providing those who wish to renovate their older homes an opportunity to understand the City's expectations. With regard to the comprehensive survey, he said he could supporl it if it were simply for the purpose of identifying those houses that meet the state standards but wondered about the unforeseen implications of the City's involvement. Mayor Thorne said he could support option 1, with "demolition" clarified in the manner and for the reasons already noted. He said it was most important that this process provide clear and easily understood policies and guidelines and noted how something as basic as a flow chart could simplify an otherwise complex set of guidelines. He said the only aspect of option 2 he could support is the comprehensive survey and that he did not support designation of an official historic district or inclusion of commercial properties in this process. Mr. Fialho said the consensus of the majority seemed to lie with options 1 and 2, with specific specific direction being to harmonize existing policies, expand the definition of "demolition," entertain design review for first floor projects, create a procedural flow chart and prepare the comprehensive survey. He requested direction on whether the Council wished for the task force to spend time developing local standards that go above and beyond what currently exists. Mr. Dolan said there are two approaches to local standards that have received tie most discussion at the task force level. The first is to rely on the Historical Context Statement, which organizes property types by physical characteristics and may or may not include consideration of the date of construction. The second would be to continue working off of the state criteria but to incorporate certain references to the local community. Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio said she liked the idea of establishing a date of significance and thought it would be critical to creating a useful survey. She wasn't sure what local standards would look like beyond that but said she would be interested in entertaining some discussion ori that moving forward. She explained that she was not interested in anything overly restrictive or cumbersome but said they do need to establish some idea of what makes historic Pleasanton historic, even if it is just a statement to that effect. Councilmember Brown said the task force has done a wonderful job thus far and she would like to let them make a recommendation on an appropriate date. Councilmember Narum said she would support examining what local standards would look like, provided that includes an analysis of the ramifications on affected property owners. She suggested it would be helpful to follow an actual property through the process of what they are looking to implement. Mayor Thorne said he would prefer to clarify what already exists before looking at any additional regulations. Councilmember Pentin suggested that if allowed to clarify, strengthen and apply those tasks outlined in option 1, they could very get to those local standards without a separate effort. Mr. Fialho clarified the majority consensus as supporting options 1 and 2, excluding design review for first floor projects and with direction to proceed cautiously in the discussion on local standards. City Council Minutes Page 11 of 16 June 4, 2013