My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060413
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
CCMIN060413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2013 4:14:19 PM
Creation date
7/22/2013 4:14:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/4/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sharrell Michelotti agreed with those who spoke against the need for additional regulations and in <br /> support of reviewing and clarifying existing documents. She encouraged the Council not to further <br /> complicate a process with additional regulations when the actual intent is to streamline it. <br /> Mayor Thorne closed the public comment. <br /> BREAK — Mayor Thorne called a recess at 8:57 p.m. and reconvened the regular meeting at 9:09 p.m. <br /> with all members present. <br /> Councilmember Narum said that as many alluded to, the eclectic and unique downtown character is <br /> part of what contributes to Pleasanton's small town charm. She stated support for something between <br /> options 2 and 3 and a revised definition of "demolition" that reduces subjectivity in a way that is <br /> thoughtful and speaks to the relevant aspects of the area. She explained that the Planning Commission <br /> put this forward as Council priority due to its ongoing struggles with inconsistencies amongst the City's <br /> various guidelines. She stated support for the comprehensive survey because of the economy of scale <br /> and clarity it would provide and thought it would serve to simplify rather than over regulate the entire <br /> process. She also stated support for the designation of a historic district, provided it does not <br /> encompass additional regulation. <br /> Councilmember Brown said that downtown homes and businesses are part of the jewel that is <br /> Pleasanton and something to be preserved. She said it is a true shame to see older homes demolished <br /> through neglect and that it is imperative to ensure there are policies in place that prevent that from <br /> happening. She acknowledging that historic home ownership is not for everyone but felt that those do <br /> take it on should be supported. She stated support for a comprehensive survey and asked if there is <br /> any sort of exemption process for those property owners who may not wish to be included. <br /> Mr. Dolan said that the state and other levels of governance do have provisions that he would have to <br /> explore further but that they generally relate to the quality of the resources rather than the interest of <br /> the property owner. If not prepared in the context of a local standard, the survey would only document <br /> whether or not a property meets the state standards. <br /> Councilmember Brown said local history is extremely important to Pleasanton and does not necessarily <br /> mirror what makes properties historically significant in the state context. She noted that she spoke with <br /> Mr. Dolan earlier about her desire to see the use of story poles with any expansion of older homes. In <br /> terms of the task force recommendations, she said she liked a blend of options 2, 3 and 4, including the <br /> designation of a local district. She questioned the value of establishing a Mills Act program based on <br /> the relatively minimal benefits to the property owner. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio said she saw this as more of a process to create a set of guidelines that could <br /> be readily understood and eliminates inconsistencies rather than to increase regulation. She said she <br /> liked option 2 and was particularly interested in clarification of existing policies and guidelines as well as <br /> the creation of the flow chart mentioned by staff. She thought the comprehensive survey would provide <br /> a benefit to property owners in terms of cost savings and certainty although if possible, she would like <br /> to explore the idea of recouping at least some of the cost to the City. She found the benchmark for the <br /> state registry of historic structures to be rather high and said she would be interested in exploring what <br /> local standards might look like. She acknowledged the importance of protecting personal property rights <br /> but thought that there could be a way to establish standards in a way that benefits those property <br /> owners, particular if it clarifies the process and expectations for them and City staff. In terms of design <br /> review, she said she has always been in favor of guidelines that preserve the look of a facade while still <br /> allowing for upgrades to modern standards. Most importantly, anything that comes out of this process <br /> must focus on providing clear and concise information for the public. <br /> Councilmember Pentin said his experience on the Planning Commission taught him that no matter how <br /> streamlined, there is no one process that works well for every circumstance or property. He said he felt <br /> City Council Minutes Page 10 of 16 June 4, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.