My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
061813
>
21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2013 4:45:44 PM
Creation date
6/12/2013 4:45:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/18/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BUDGET SUMMARY <br /> 2013/14FY&2014115FY Operating Budget <br /> 2012/13FY <br /> 2009/10FY 2010/11FY 2011/12FY Midyear 2013/142FY % 2014/15FY % <br /> Sales Tax Revenue Actual Actual Actual Budget Projected ,Change Projected Change <br /> Total Sales Tax $15,420,066 $18,503,316 $19,107,418 $19,000,000 $19,740,000 3.9% $20,300,000 2.8% <br /> User Fee Cost Recovery <br /> The City of Pleasanton provides many services to the public. Some services provide a general <br /> benefit to the community such as police and fire protection and are almost entirely paid for by <br /> general taxes. Other services, such as building inspections, permitting, and recreation classes <br /> provide a special benefit to an individual, group, or company and a user fee is charged to <br /> recover all or a portion of the cost of providing that special service. It is the general policy of <br /> the City to recover its costs from individuals and/or groups who benefit from a particular <br /> service. A user fee study was completed for the Community Development Department in <br /> 2011. The study updated the cost of providing planning, building, engineering and fire <br /> inspection services including overhead and indirect costs. These fees have not been increased <br /> since 1992. Staff will present the results of the study to Council in the Fall of 2013 for their <br /> review and consideration. The following table presents the additional revenues that would be <br /> added to the Operating Budget upon approval of the fee study by City Council. <br /> hcrease in Community Development User Fees <br /> 2013/14FY 2014/15FY <br /> User Fee Study I $350,000 I $700,000 <br /> General Fund Expenditures <br /> The General Fund Operating Budget is balanced. This was very difficult given increases in <br /> PERS rates and medical costs anticipated during the next two years, labor cost increases per <br /> labor contracts and increases due to restoring the City's practice of transferring funds to the <br /> capital improvement program. <br /> Increases <br /> Personnel costs represent 77% of the overall Operating Budget in 2013/14FY and 77.8% in <br /> 2014/15FY. The increases over the next two years are due to the following: <br /> 13/14FY 14/15FY <br /> • PERS Employer Contribution Increases* <br /> • Police 5.8% 7.1% <br /> • Fire 6.8% 5.2% <br /> • Miscellaneous & Management 9.7% 4.9% <br /> 'These increases were offset partially by the continued pick-up by the employees of the Employer Paid Member Contribution(EPMC).As of <br /> December 1,2013,the employees are picking-up 100%of the EPMC(see table on page 7-Employee Contribution Paid by the City). <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.