My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
060413
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2015 2:40:52 PM
Creation date
6/3/2013 12:15:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/4/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Karen Diaz c,GZc'iN6 "f(�'l y4rccIpo <br /> Subject: FW: Historic Options ruvided to th a City Council <br /> 'After Distribution of Packet <br /> From: Peter MacDonald Date (Q —7`i a ./3_ <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 5:19 PM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> Cc: <br /> Subject: Historic Options <br /> Good evening Members of.the Council, <br /> A family matter has come up which prevents me from being at City Council tonight. <br /> I support the points made in Jan Batcheller's letter to you yesterday and signed the Petition she is <br /> presenting you with. <br /> The City tried to institute a restrictive historic ordinance after the initial adoption of the Downtown <br /> Specific Plan, and residents successfully protested that we have too many restrictions now. And yet, <br /> historically significant properties are all being preserved already, along with some buildings not <br /> worthy of preservation. <br /> It is not enough to exempt just commercial properties from a historic ordinance because the <br /> restrictions that need updating are in the Historic Preservation chapter of the Downtown Specific <br /> Plan, which applies to all areas in the downtown — residential and commercial. The City should focus <br /> on updating and clarifying that Historic Preservation Chapter, and then a separate historic ordinance <br /> should become unnecessary. <br /> Take care, Pete <br /> Peter MacDonald <br /> Law Office of Peter MacDonald <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.