09 - Laserfiche WebLink

2. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.D-1a set forth in Table 6-1 of the Final SEIR and listed in the MMRP will ensure that Impact 4.D-5 would be reduced to a less than significant level and is hereby incorporated by reference and described below: 4.0-1a: On Sites 6 and 21, prior to PUD approval or demolition, whichever occurs first, the project applicant shall have a historic resource evaluation conducted for the homes and outbuildings on Site 6 and for the residence on Site 21, as applicable. If it is determined that a structure is historic, Mitigation Measure 4.0-lb will be required. If the structure is not found to be historic, demolition of the structure will be considered a less than significant impact. Site(s) affected: Sites 6, 21 (Draft SEIR, p. 4.D-20.) Impact 4.D-6 Construction resulting from development facilitated by the General Plan Amendment and rezonings, in combination with construction of other past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future development in the vicinity, would cause a significant cumulative impact to currently unknown cultural resources at the site, potentially including an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.6 or Public Resources Code section 21083.2(g), or the disturbance of any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries, as well as paleontological resources. The SEIR evaluates the impacts of the Project regarding the potential for past, present, existing, approved, pending and reasonably foreseeable future development to adversely affect archaeological and paleontological resources or human remains on or adjacent to cumulative project sites. Significance Before Mitigation: Significant Significance After Mitigation: Less than Significant Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that would avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the SEIR. Mitigation Measures 4.D-3 and 4.0-4, which are described above and have been required in or incorporated into the Project, will reduce the significant environmental impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts and mitigation measures indicate that the impact will be reduced to less than significant. 1. For CEQA purposes, it is conservatively assumed that development facilitated by the proposed Housing Element could result in impacts to archeological or paleontological resources. Other past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the City that have, or will have, resulted in like impacts could combine with the Housing Element projects to form a significant cumulative impact to archeological or paleontological resources.