My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN012813JT
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
CCMIN012813JT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2014 11:24:04 AM
Creation date
5/9/2013 4:39:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/28/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
age groups, like special education services and technology needs which are all different from ten years <br /> ago. <br /> • 10 Year Enrollment Projections <br /> • Growth at Donlon and Lydiksen, anticipate capacity challenges <br /> • Middle Schools — 170 students over the next 10 years addressed in 1,:200 student planning <br /> capacity <br /> • High Schools — 358 students over the next 10 years addressed in the 2,400 +/- 10% planning <br /> capacity <br /> Councilmember Pentin asked for clarification on the growth at Donlon and Lydiksen if it included the <br /> units that were just discussed in the housing element item. Mr. Newsom replied, "Yes, this information <br /> was from Davis Demographics, which include future housing projections." <br /> Preferred School Size for Planning — Draft Recommendation is as follows: <br /> • Elementary Schools—600-700 Students <br /> • Middle Schools — 1,000-1,200 Students <br /> • High Schools — 2,400 Students (+l- 10%) <br /> Mr. Newsom highlighted the existing ranges and the 2021 ranges by residence. The data was based on <br /> projections from the June 14, 2012 Report by Davis Demographics & Planning, Inc. Superintendent <br /> Ahmadi stated PUSD currently doesn't have any schools with 480 students in them. <br /> • Cost Development Process <br /> • Define Scope of Work at Each Campus <br /> • Measure Areas for Building Modernization and Site Improvements <br /> • Develop New Construction Programs <br /> • Apply Hard and Soft Cost Mark Ups <br /> • Itemize Scope into Categories <br /> • Detail Scope Items under each Category <br /> Mr. Newsom reviewed the 20 Categories of Improvements, which were not in priority order: <br /> • Existing Building Systems <br /> • Program Reconfiguration <br /> • Kindergarten Improvements <br /> • New Classrooms <br /> • Science and Elementary Explore Labs <br /> • Electives/Career Tech. Ed. Grants <br /> • Music/MPR Improvements <br /> • Performing Arts/Theater <br /> • High School PE Improvements <br /> • Stadium Upgrades <br /> • Main Office Improvements <br /> • Libraries/Learning Centers <br /> • Outdoor Learning Landscape & Hardscape <br /> • Playfields/Hard-court, Site Security Fencing <br /> • Shade Structures <br /> • Front Door/Entry Canopy Improvements <br /> • Student Safety/Parking Drop Off Reconfiguration <br /> • Classroom Flexibility Furniture <br /> • Technology/Data Network Capabilities <br /> • New Central Kitchen <br /> Joint City Council and <br /> PUSD Board Minutes Page 5 of 11 January 28,2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.