CCMIN012813JT - Laserfiche WebLink

to how these units translate into students, he said they will use their expertise and data from the demographers report. Mr. Fialho added that the Growth Management Program the City Council adopted provides a bit of relief for infrastructures such as a school site. We have half of the nine properties in some active development stage that were recently rezoned for the next cycle of 2014-2022, and Growth Management Program calls for, with some exceptions, of about 300 units per year, which is in lieu of housing cap. Trustee Laursen asked what the expected planning process for these remaining units was. Mr. Dolan stated it wasn't determined just yet. In the next 60-90 days, his department will be working with the City Manager to determine the planning process. Trustee Arkin inquired if and when there's additional housing in the East Side Specific Plan area and how that would change the estimate of additional residential housing numbers. He added it's anticipated that area will absorb some of that impact. Trustee Arkin asked if the identified properties and possible school sites such as CM Capital Properties, being near Hart Middle School would that be suitable for a school site or would there be any restrictions. Mr. Dolan responded, "It's an interesting property and the future of that property is uncertain at this time." President Bowser asked about the difference between purchase and rental. He asked, "Is it determined by the developer or by the market and does it matter as you determine your housing stock analysis?" Mr. Dolan responded, "The State doesn't have any rules and neither does the City about that. When you get to a certain density, it's determined by the market." President Bowser inquired about the forecast, which is mostly dependent on the developer. He asked, "Are we penalized for that, or is it fully dependent upon the market developer. Mr. Dolan shared the only obligation the city has is the zoning and no one is penalized for that. 5. PUSD FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Superintendent Ahmadi highlighted that on Oct. 25, 2011 the board awarded a contract to LPA to create a FMP. This plan will be used as a strategic tool, enabling the District to identify and prioritize short and long term facility goals over the next 10 to 20 years. On January 24, 2012, representatives from LPA provided the Board an overview of the process including key tasks, the plan to collect input from committees and other stakeholders, and a timeline with a meeting schedule. At a Board study session on November 27, 2012, the planning team provided an update on the work completed since June and presented the compilation of all of their work. The final version of the Facilities Master Plan will be presented tomorrow, January 29, 2013, at our Board meeting for approval. Ms. Ahmadi introduced Mr. Steve Newsom, an Architect with LPA, who give an overview of the PUSD Facilities Master Plan. Mr. Newsom highlighted the following: • What is a Facility Master Plan? • He explained a facilities master plan is a document describing a strategy to address the need for facility improvements and for capital investments to support current and future educational programs. • The school district's educational plan drives the development of the facilities master plan, and the community is involved in its execution. • Why create a Master Plan? • School facilities are linked to the District's educational goals. Joint City Council and PUSD Board Minutes Page 3 of 11 January 28, 2013