My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN012813JT
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
CCMIN012813JT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2014 11:24:04 AM
Creation date
5/9/2013 4:39:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/28/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The sites currently in development review were: <br /> • Pleasanton Gateway — (South Bay Development, 210 multifamily units and 88 single family <br /> units) <br /> • Auf de Maur (E.S. Ring, 345 multifamily units) <br /> • Nearon (St. Anton Partners, 168 multifamily units) <br /> • Can America (Residences at California Center, 205 multifamily units) <br /> With the above, approved projects and other small projects, approximately 1,600 units may be in <br /> development in the next five years. <br /> Housing Element for 2014-2022 Planning Period: <br /> • Will start preparation in the summer/fall 2013 <br /> • State deadline for adoption is December 2014 <br /> • 2014-2022 Regional Housing Needs Assessment totaled 2,058 <br /> The income categories and draft regional housing need allocation is: <br /> • Very Low Income -713 <br /> • Low Income - 389 <br /> • Moderate Income - 405 <br /> • Above Moderate Income - 551 <br /> Mr. Dolan noted there would be properties left over from the previous housing element cycle; they won't <br /> be starting from scratch. If they are undeveloped and no one has come forward, those properties will be <br /> used again in their inventory, which will be available for development. Their number won't be that high. <br /> Councilmember Pentin asked for clarification on the application approval and the beginning of <br /> development. <br /> Mr. Dolan highlighted the Estimate of Additional Residential Zoning Needed to meet 2012-2022 RHNA. <br /> Mayor Thorne asked if the 38 acres (referenced on page 3 of the presentation) included everything they <br /> had in inventory. Mr. Dolan replied, "It's what we need in addition." Mr. Thorne asked what density they <br /> calculated to determine those 38 acres. Mr. Dolan responded that it was approximately five to eight <br /> units per acre, but they would need to confirm that figure. <br /> Councilmember Brown asked if the need for above moderate housing is new. Mr. Dolan noted it wasn't <br /> new. <br /> Councilmember Brown noted that in the past they've used a lack of infrastructure and potential school <br /> capacity when they're looking at additional housing, and in this case we cannot and asked him to <br /> comment on her question. Mr. Dolan responded, "You can't use school capacity as a reason not to <br /> meet your minimum zoning inventory." Ms. Brown added that it has been mandated by the State and <br /> most of the residents aren't in favor of this, however, we don't have a choice. <br /> Mr. Dolan continued to highlight the various zoning categories on the chart on page three of the <br /> presentation. <br /> Questions/Answers from City Council/Board of Trustees/Staff: <br /> Trustee Grant asked Mr. Dolan to speak to the size of the 2000 units and the impact of the K-12 <br /> student population. Mr. Grant expressed that the district and city need to work together for suitable <br /> physical locations, as our elementary schools are already at capacity. Mr. Dolan shared the city <br /> definitely wants to work with the district in locating any future sites that might be necessary. In regards <br /> Joint City Council and <br /> PUSD Board Minutes Page 2 of 11 January 28, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.