My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
050713
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2013 11:35:57 AM
Creation date
5/6/2013 11:37:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/7/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 7. In 2005 through 2007, it also became evident that the City Manager and other City staff <br /> 2 were involved in negotiations with various developers over the location and extension of roads <br /> 3 associated with proposed developments. Thus the location of roadways was one of the areas we <br /> 4 sought to regulate when we drafted Measure PP. <br /> 8. In 2006, I discussed in a Planning Commission meeting that the City Manager was <br /> 5 <br /> engaged in private negotiations with the developer over the proposed Oak Grove project. Other <br /> 6 <br /> commissioners raised similar concerns, including concerns about development of the Southeast <br /> 7 <br /> Hills. These concerns are indicated in the Planning Commission minutes. Staff would not <br /> 8 agendize the Southeast Hills situation for the full commission. We were told by the City <br /> 9 Attorney that since those negotiations were private, no public disclosure was required. This led <br /> 10 those of us drafting the initiative to believe we needed to place strict limitations on all hillside <br /> I I construction activities, including roadways, to preclude such private negotiations from occurring. <br /> 12 9. I was involved extensively in drafting Measure PP. My initial model for the initiative <br /> 13 was the City of San Juan Capistrano's ordinance regulating hillside development. That <br /> 14 ordinance included a specific exception for arterial roadways identified in that city's general <br /> 15 plan's circulation element. We who were drafting the measure specifically decided not to <br /> 16 include a similar exception in the measure we were drafting. <br /> 17 10. Those of us drafting Measure PP, and Pleasanton residents generally, were very aware of <br /> 18 roadways in the hillside area that had been approved on steep hillsides. As a resident of <br /> Pleasanton, I am very aware that the very visible and dangerously steep Santos Ranch Road <br /> 19 <br /> traveling up the side of Pleasanton Ridge was closed many years ago, before I moved to <br /> 20 <br /> Pleasanton, after it claimed several lives. 1 know that after a car with teenagers lost its brakes <br /> 21 <br /> traveling down Santos Ranch Road on December 18, 1975 and crashed into a car traveling on <br /> 22 Foothill Road, City Councilmember Roger McLain worked to have it permanently closed to the <br /> 23 public. Santos Ranch Road leading to the so-called "Hayward Hotel" atop Pleasanton Ridge is <br /> 24 both an eyesore and a safety hazard. Preventing similar mistakes was very much on our minds <br /> 25 as we drafted Measure PP. <br /> 26 / / / / / / <br /> 27 / / / / / / <br /> 28 2 <br /> 29 DECLARATION OF ANNE Fox RE.DRAFTING OF MEASURE PP <br /> 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.