My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
050713
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2013 11:35:57 AM
Creation date
5/6/2013 11:37:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/7/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development director also stated that he had did have concerns about "...the <br /> elevation and grade about the part of Santos Ranch Road from which the proposed new street will be <br /> accessed." <br /> A City Councilmember who voted to approve this amendment who was formerly a Planning <br /> Commission stated that he did not want traffic from future developments coming through <br /> Junipero, a street near his residence. Since this City Councilmember was opposed to 15 <br /> percent grade roads off of Foothill Road in Pleasanton in December 2010, it is surprising that <br /> this Councilmember would support construction roads on slopes of 25 percent or greater on <br /> locations near his residence in order to keep traffic off of Junipero. <br /> A City Council policy promoting building roadways on steep slopes in excess of 25% is <br /> inconsistent with previous city council, planning staff, and planning commission policies on <br /> steep roads. <br /> Roadways Newly Re-Cast as "Infrastructure" Not Consistent with General and Specific <br /> Plan Definitions <br /> Three city council members at the last meeting that either opposed Measure PP in the first <br /> place or supported the countermeasure QQ to defeat Measure PP each echoed similar <br /> comments---that they had done 'recent' research. The three city council members also said <br /> that even though they considered roadways subject to Measure PP when they each wrote or <br /> signed ballot arguments against PP and for QQ when it was before the voters four years ago, <br /> now state that through their recent independent research, they each concluded roadways are <br /> now "infrastructure." <br /> This is inconsistent with the 1996 General Plan that Measure PP amended and the Happy <br /> Valley Specific Plan that was the subject of Councilmember Cook-Kallio's original signed <br /> ballot arguments submitted to city in August 2008 in opposition to Measure PP. <br /> "Infrastructure" Definition in 1996 General Plan <br /> The ballot arguments against Measure PP that Councilmember Cook-Kallio signed in August <br /> 2008 were included in the voter pamphlet to inform voters that roadways were subject to <br /> Measure PP provisions. It said PP would "Stop the promised Happy Valley by-pass road." <br /> Reclassifying roadways four years later as "infrastructure" is inconsistent with the1996 <br /> Pleasanton General Plan definition which was in effect when voters approved Measure PP, <br /> which is--- <br /> "Infrastructure refers to the capital improvements required to service development such as sewer, <br /> water, and storm drainage." <br /> "Infrastructure" Definition in the Happy Valley Specific Plan <br /> Reclassifying roadways as "infrastructure" is also inconsistent with the Happy Valley Specific <br /> Plan definitions of infrastructure that discussed the term in relation to water, sanitary sewer <br /> and storm drainage systems. The common understanding of"infrastructure" that voters had <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.