Laserfiche WebLink
Staff reached out to the Economic Vitality Committee and Committee on Energy and the Environment <br /> for input and, with the help of the Economic Development Director, developed a focus group comprised <br /> of representatives from Hacienda Business Park, the Chamber of Commerce, Pleasanton Downtown <br /> Association, Kaiser Permanente, Alameda County fairgrounds and the at large community. The focus <br /> group was unanimous in its support to move forward with the ban and helped to craft the outreach <br /> efforts. Staff issued 232 letters to those businesses and individuals within the community that might be <br /> affected by the ordinance. The letter included a handout that provided details and a Q&A on what items <br /> would be banned, potential alternatives and a link to the ordinance. Staff received only 3 responses, <br /> each noting that the business was already in compliance and supporting the effort. <br /> Mr. Smith said that if approved, the ordinance would take effect July 1, 2013. As written, the ordinance <br /> allows vendors a 6 month grace period during which they may utilize existing supplies and enforcement <br /> would begin January 1, 2014. He thanked those businesses that are already in compliance and said the <br /> City would list each compliant entity on the Green Scene website. <br /> Councilmember Brown asked and confirmed that the City has jurisdiction over the fairgrounds. Mr. <br /> Smith explained that while it is county property, the fairgrounds are located within Pleasanton and <br /> therefore the ordinance can be enforced. He noted that their representatives were very supportive of <br /> the proposal. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio noted that the school district was not included in the focus group and asked if <br /> they are already compliant. <br /> Mr. Smith said the district declined to participate for unknown reasons but did indicate that they had no <br /> objections. He could not confirm their level of compliance other than to note that they do still use some <br /> polystyrene but he believed it was being phased out. <br /> Mayor Thorne asked whether there is a cost deterrent to using polystyrene alternatives. <br /> Mr. Smith said that as the use increases, the price of compostable and recyclable materials has <br /> decreased considerably and in some instances can be more cost effective than polystyrene. <br /> Councilmember Brown asked if staff reached out to Castlewood, which under the purview of <br /> Pleasanton. <br /> Mr. Smith explained that Castlewood is outside the city limits of Pleasanton and therefore not subject to <br /> the City's municipal ordinances, although he would be happy to reach out to them. He also noted that <br /> Castlewood's storm drains are not part of the City's own storm drain system. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio asked if there is any movement at the county level to adopt something similar. <br /> Mr. Smith could not confirm but did say the county has been proactive in all other areas concerning <br /> clean air concepts and he would be surprised if they did not in the near future. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio asked and Mr. Smith confirmed that the ban does not apply to plastic flatware, <br /> for which there is a recyclable alternative. <br /> Mayor Thorne opened the public hearing and, seeing no speakers, closed the public hearing. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Cook-Kallio/Pentin to introduce and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 2064 <br /> requiring the use of recyclable or compostable material and prohibiting the use of expanded <br /> Polystyrene products by food vendors for the transport of prepared food. Motion passed by the <br /> following vote: <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 11 April 2, 2013 <br />