My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
050713
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2013 4:34:44 PM
Creation date
5/1/2013 4:34:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/7/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
alteration of any grade exceeding 25% is in violation of the intent of PP and therefore the question of <br /> how to define a road is irrelevant. He also said he wanted to be sure there were no conflicts of interest <br /> with regards to City staff paying people to attend public meetings and make certain comments on the <br /> public record. <br /> Mayor Thorne if Mr. Rajagopalan could recall when the signage was erected at the end of his street. <br /> Mr. Rajagopalan said 2007 or 2008. <br /> Carol Spain shared her support for Ms. Lofland's comments and said she also serves as a member of <br /> the Ventana Hills Steering Committee. She suggested that the Council to defer to the initiative authors <br /> in determining the measure's intent regarding roads rather than asking those who voted. She also <br /> suggested that the Council evaluate Councilmember Brown's question as a viable option. If the Council <br /> votes that a road is a structure, it limits the ability to make decisions on various projects as they come <br /> forward. If however, they vote not to define roads, the Council can exercise more common sense based <br /> on each individual development. <br /> It was m/s to continue the public hearing to the next City Council meeting to be held April 16, 2013. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> BREAK: Mayor Thorne called a brief recess at 8:39 p.m. and reconvened 8:41 p.m. with all members <br /> present. <br /> 9. Introduction of an ordinance requiring the use of recyclable or compostable material and <br /> prohibiting the use of expanded polystyrene products by food vendors for the transport of <br /> prepared food <br /> Director of Operation Services Smith presented the staff report via PowerPoint. He explained that the <br /> proposed ordinance prohibits polystyrene, also known as PS 6 Styrofoam, for local consumer and <br /> institutional uses that include food service ware and containers like those used for takeout goods, soda <br /> and other refreshments, and event dining. The ordinance does not apply to prepackaged goods <br /> originating from outside of Pleasanton. <br /> The primary drivers of the ordinance include environmental impacts, health concerns and requirements <br /> from the State Water Resources Control Board. Polystyrene is largely non-recyclable, particularly when <br /> used in food service, and not biodegradable. As part of the City's Climate Action Plan (CAP) this <br /> ordinance would make significant progress in reducing what goes into the landfill. Ton for ton, <br /> polystyrene also has 1,000 to 1,300 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide. According to <br /> the Environmental Protection Agency, ingesting food out of warmed polystyrene containers can release <br /> the carcinogen into a person's system. Mr. Smith explained that newer municipal storm water <br /> requirements require the cities to reduce the amount of trash in storm water discharge by 40% over the <br /> baseline by July 2014. The proposed ordinance, which is expected to yield an 8% decrease, was <br /> submitted as one strategy to meet this obligation. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio asked what other reduction measures the City has taken. <br /> Mr. Smith stated that trash capture devices have been loaded into storm drain inlets. While this will be <br /> the first reporting year, he estimated they would provide a 10% to 15% reduction. <br /> Mr. Smith reported that nearly 100 government agencies have adopted similar ordinances and that this <br /> ordinance is consistent with the City of Livermore's. The proposed ordinance supports Solid Waste <br /> Initiatives 11 and 16, as identified in the CAP, which speak to reducing landfills as well as plastic and <br /> foam use. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 7 of 11 April 2, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.