My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA REPORT
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
050113 WORKSHOP
>
AGENDA REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2015 12:42:53 PM
Creation date
4/25/2013 11:02:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/1/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
AGENDA REPORT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This disconnect is also evident between the City's Housing Site Development Standards <br /> and Design Guidelines which require compliance with the City's IZO and the "by right" <br /> aspect of high density rental housing. <br /> Finally, the City is expected to implement a range of Housing Element programs that <br /> should, if appropriately applied, lead to meeting state mandated and RHNA housing and <br /> affordable housing targets. However, absent strict IZO requirements, it is doubtful that <br /> new affordable housing units will approach these targets. Regarding this matter, as <br /> evidenced in the table below, even in the best of situations, meeting RHNA targets is <br /> impractical within the current housing market. <br /> SUMMARY OF CURRENT AND DRAFT RHNA <br /> 2007 — 2014 2014— 2022 <br /> Income Levels Ado•ted RHNA Draft RHNA <br /> Very Low (50°/0 AMI) 1,076 713 <br /> Low (80% AMI) 728 389 <br /> Moderate (80% to 120% AMI) 720 405 <br /> Above Moderate (+120% AMI) 753 551 <br /> TOTAL UNITS 3,277 2,058 <br /> As an example, assuming that the California Center, St. Anton and Auf der Maur <br /> developments each met its affordability goals by providing all 15% of their inclusionary <br /> units at very low income, a total of 117 very low income units would be provided. <br /> Notwithstanding this situation, the City is obligated to carrying out its Housing Element <br /> that is designed to meet both RHNA goals and state housing policies requiring cities to <br /> demonstrate how they will meet existing and projected housing needs for all income <br /> categories. <br /> Affordable Housing Rent Calculations <br /> Prior to reviewing available options for amending the IZO, it's important to note that the <br /> generally accepted definition of affordability is to provide housing so that a household <br /> pays no more than 30 percent of its monthly income on housing (i.e., rent or mortgage). <br /> Families who pay more than 30 percent of their income for housing are considered cost <br /> burdened and may have difficulty affording necessities such as food, clothing, <br /> transportation and medical care. As a way of fine tuning the definition, HUD established <br /> various generally accepted income categories of very low, low, median and moderate <br /> which are used as identifiers for various income levels. Further, these general income <br /> levels are categorized by household size. (Attachment 3 details the recent HUD income <br /> figures.) As a result, providing affordable housing units includes establishing a rent <br /> structure that is no more than 30% percent of a household's income based on annual <br /> income and household size. <br /> One common variation to the above standard is that while household size is always <br /> consistent when determining annual income qualification (that is a three person <br /> household must meet the income requirements for a three person household), the <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.