My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA REPORT
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
050113 WORKSHOP
>
AGENDA REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2015 12:42:53 PM
Creation date
4/25/2013 11:02:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/1/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
AGENDA REPORT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> The City's IZO was adopted to establish a clear and attainable plan for using the limited <br /> remaining developable land in a manner that is consistent with City housing policies. To <br /> that end, the IZO establishes that 15% of all units in a new residential multi-family rental <br /> development in excess of 15-units shall be rent-restricted to very low (50% of the Area <br /> Median Income or AMI; currently $44,600 for a four person household) and low income <br /> households (80% of the AMI; currently $71,350 for a four person household) and that <br /> 20% of all units in a new residential ownership development be made available to very <br /> low, low income households and/or moderate income (120% of the AMI; currently <br /> $105,050 for a four person household) households. In addition while the IZO is clear in <br /> stating that its goal is to obtain affordable inclusionary units, it does recognize that this <br /> may not always be practical and as such, it lists alternatives including: <br /> . Provide for inclusionary units at a location within the City other than the project site <br /> . Dedication of land to a non-profit housing developer for development of affordable <br /> units <br /> . Credit transfers that allow one unit with an excess in the number of affordable units <br /> to make them available to another development <br /> . Other alternatives approved by the City <br /> In addition to the above, upon City approval, an applicant may pay the City's Lower <br /> Income Housing Fee (LIHF) which is currently $2,655/unit for rental developments and <br /> single family homes under 1,500 sf in lieu of providing affordable units. The fee for <br /> single family homes in excess of 1,500 sf is currently $10,713/unit and the fee for <br /> commercial development is $2.83 per sf. It should be noted that in accordance with long <br /> term practice, the fee option is considered only after all other options are determined to <br /> be impractical. <br /> In addition to these alternatives, the IZO also outlines incentives the City may offer to <br /> assist with obtaining inclusionary units including, fee waivers, design modifications such <br /> as reduced setbacks and landscaping, second mortgages and other City financial <br /> assistance, and priority permit processing. <br /> In addition to the IZO, in July 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution 10-390 which <br /> states in part, the City will act affirmatively to promote development of well designed <br /> affordable housing for families with children and the construction of affordable three <br /> bedroom units for large families (Attachment 3). <br /> Current IZO Environment <br /> In general, the most significant issue regarding the IZO is that there is currently a <br /> "disconnect" between the requirement that 15% of all units in a new residential multi- <br /> family rental development be rent-restricted and the Palmer case which held that local <br /> inclusionary requirements requiring rent restricted units violate the Costa-Hawkins Act <br /> that allows landlords to set the initial rent for a new unit and to adjust rents to market <br /> levels whenever a unit is vacated (so-called "vacancy decontrol"). <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.