Laserfiche WebLink
The major hill area developments remaining in the City that would be potentially <br /> impacted by the Initiative are as follows: <br /> Table 1 <br /> Project Maximum Estimated Net Unit <br /> Development Development Transfer from <br /> Potential Under Initiative Hill Areas <br /> (DU's)7 (DU's)a (DU's) <br /> Lund II 86 5 (10 by default) <br /> Lester 39 0 (10 by default) <br /> Spotomo Upper 81 11 <br /> Valley—Current <br /> GP <br /> Spotomo Flat— 79 63 9 <br /> Proposed GP/SP <br /> Amendment <br /> Foley 18 1 (10 by default) <br /> Oak Grove t° 51 0 (10 by default) <br /> Total 275/222 11 51/103 12 119-224 <br /> Transferring residential development from hillside properties to infill properties would <br /> not impact the City's ability to meet its current regional housing needs since the self- <br /> imposed limit to our Regional Housing Needs Allocation(RHNA) is 29,000 units—the <br /> housing cap. However,to the extent that 119 to 224 hillside units are developed in infill <br /> areas of the City rather than the hillsides, it is likely that such units would be higher <br /> density,multiple family dwellings or smaller single family homes; some would likely be <br /> able to qualify as very low, low, and/or moderate income units. This would help <br /> Pleasanton in attaining our lower income share of the RHNA numbers. <br /> Housing Unit Definition: <br /> Regarding the portion of the Initiative that defines "housing unit", the question has been <br /> raised as to whether assisted living units and second units must be included as"housing <br /> units"and therefore counted towards the housing cap.13 (See also Section 5.20,below.) <br /> ' Number of potential dwelling units per General Plan Midpoint Density <br /> Number of units estimated under Initiative <br /> 9 Initiative does not appear to affect Spotomo Flat;estimate based on developer's estimate of minimum <br /> number of units needed to fund Bypass Road. Verification of developer assumptions have not been <br /> confirmed by staff at this time. It is also questionable whether the Initiative precludes the Bypass Road <br /> (see Section 5.7). <br /> 1° Assuming project overturned by referendum;Dwelling Units(DU)based on approved project <br /> II Total with Spotomo Upper Valley and Oak Grove/Total with Spotomo Flat without Oak Grove <br /> 1= Total with Spotomo Upper Valley/Total with Spotomo Flat <br /> 13 The application of the Initiative's definition of"housing unit"would be prospective only for new <br /> projects,as the Initiative did not include language specifically providing for retroactivity. <br /> 6 <br />