My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
041613
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 3:00:43 PM
Creation date
4/15/2013 11:14:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Document Relationships
10
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2013\040213
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Karen Gonzales <br /> °rom: Ann Jokinen on behalf of Mayor and City Council <br /> ent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 2:45 PM <br /> To: Pleasanton City Clerk <br /> Cc: Maria Lara; Joanne Hall <br /> Subject: FW: Measure PP <br /> SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br /> Provided to the City Council <br /> After Distribution of Packet <br /> Original Message Date a C/ 9 (7 (3 <br /> From: Vicki LaBarge [ <br /> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 2:34 PM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> Cc: Brown Justin <br /> Subject: Measure PP <br /> I am a resident of Mission Hills and cannot attend the Council meeting April 16th as i will be out of town. <br /> When I purchased my home in 1984 Lund ranch was just that a ranch with hills and cows. Today Ventana Hills housing <br /> development resides where cattle once resided. <br /> Several things happened when Ventana Hills was built out. 1 traffic that was supposed to go down Mission Drive ended <br /> up being changed to flow down Junipero, this was never planned, but somehow was changed via planners and the city. <br /> 2 through traffic is no longer allowed (and has not been allowed for years) on Dolores Drive - why-well it seems <br /> -omeone of influence in the City lives on Dolores and NIMBY (not in my back yard) exists - no cut through on that street. <br /> As Ventana Hills was developed roads were planned to route traffic of future development out of this area through <br /> Sycamore connections. Signs have been in place for years. <br /> Junipero cannot and should not be the primary access and departure street for future development of the hills. Also, as <br /> a civil engineer has documented - roads are not structures- and therefore should not be considered as such under <br /> measure PP. <br /> It is unfortunate the home owners on Sycamore do not want traffic on their street, but why would it be ok to allow <br /> more traffic on Junipero which was never intended to be a through street? The residents of Sycamore have known their <br /> street would be a connector since they purchased their homes. <br /> I strongly oppose streets being considered structures and urge the City Council to do the right thing and not allow roads <br /> to be considered structures. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Victoria LaBarge <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Sent from my iPad <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.