My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
041613
>
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 3:03:53 PM
Creation date
4/10/2013 3:42:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 1,4,6,9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> helps the Commissioners a lot in terms of their ability to follow along and get a real <br /> close and personal look at the pictures. <br /> Mr. Otto acknowledged the compliment. <br /> Commissioner Narum asked Mr. Otto to display the project layout slide once more and <br /> point out where the playground equipment or the open space amenities for children is <br /> located. <br /> Mr. Otto pointed out the tot lot on the picture and then zoomed-in to the central open <br /> space area where the tot lot was located. <br /> Commissioner Narum noted that at the Work Session, the Commission talked about an <br /> open area for children to run around. <br /> Mr. Otto pointed out a field area as well as slightly smaller one above the bocce ball <br /> court. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired how big that open field was. <br /> Mr. Otto replied that he would defer that question as well as other questions relating to <br /> the details of the project to the applicant. <br /> Commissioner Pearce referred to Sheet L1.03 and noted that the open space hierarchy <br /> legend mentions "semi-private" and "semi-public." She stated they sound like the same <br /> thing and inquired what the difference is between them. <br /> Mr. Otto replied that he believes the "semi-public" can also be used by the office tenants <br /> in addition to the residents, and deferred to the applicant to clarify the difference. <br /> Commissioner Posson requested clarification on the implications of the Housing <br /> Commission not taking action on the affordable units. He inquired if, procedurally, the <br /> Planning Commission can take action on the project even if the affordable units are not <br /> defined. <br /> For the benefit of Commissioner Posson, who is new to the Commission, as well as for <br /> that of the public, Chair Blank requested staff to review the responsibility of the Housing <br /> Commission vis-a-vis its approvals or non-approvals, and the issues that affect the <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> Brian Dolan explained that the Housing Commission and Planning Commission <br /> processes typically run simultaneously and are tracked together, and most of the time <br /> the Housing Commission hearing occurs before the Planning Commission hearing, as <br /> was the case for this project. He added that the Housing Commission is charged with <br /> making a recommendation to the City Council with respect to the Affordable Housing <br /> Agreement between the City and the project owner/developer; however, for this project, <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 3/27/2013 Page 2 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.