My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
041613
>
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 3:03:53 PM
Creation date
4/10/2013 3:42:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 1,4,6,9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Blank stated that he thinks they are pretty good. He commented that he <br /> saw only one tot lot in the area, and that seemed a little light to him. He noted that there <br /> might be an opportunity in Building P where there is that big area, not necessarily to put <br /> in a play structure but to have a recreational area where kids could play. He pointed out <br /> that residents living in Building P would have to go all the way over to the other side to <br /> where Building C is. <br /> Chair Pentin stated he was fine with the on-site recreational facilities and amenities, <br /> with the addition of Commissioner Blank's comments. <br /> E. Are the building designs, colors and materials, and heights acceptable? <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that, as everyone knows, he is really big on the Pleasanton <br /> look, but people also know that he backed away from that with the Transit-Oriented <br /> Developments (TOD) because obviously, it is different than the Pleasanton look. He <br /> stated that overall, he is generally fine with this. He requested that when the project <br /> comes back to the Commission for the hearing, he would like to actually get to see <br /> visuals. He noted that Safeway had great visuals where they actually had people <br /> driving around the parking lots so the Commission could see how the buildings look and <br /> what the viewscapes were. He noted that it really helps the Commission and the public <br /> to get a good handle of what it is going to look like. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that preliminarily, she thinks everything looks great. She <br /> indicated that the color palette looks fine but that she would love to see some actual <br /> colors which the Commission can look at under their day light lamps. <br /> Commissioner Blank requested that the size of the color palettes be about 10 x 10, as <br /> opposed to the one-inch square ones, so the Commission can get a sense of the colors. <br /> Commissioner Pearce agreed. <br /> Commissioner Narum stated that she was fine overall, with one comment. She referred <br /> to page A2-14 of the plans and noted that the colors of the amenity buildings, <br /> specifically the mustard color, appear to be conflicting when put alongside the podium. <br /> Commissioner Blank noted that it could be the color from the printer. <br /> Commissioner Narum commented that she was pleased with the simplified towers <br /> which have that Pleasanton look. <br /> Commissioner Blank agreed and added that he saw a little bit of that in there, and he <br /> always wants more. <br /> Commissioner Pearce noted that she was looking at the same buildings when she <br /> asked for actual colors. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 10, 2012 Page 10 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.