Laserfiche WebLink
means nothing to theme. She stated that these people have no problem going 60 miles <br /> per hour on Independence Drive, and her neighborhood was never intended to have <br /> this type of traffic. She added that she is sure the Commission has heard many times <br /> that people cut through on Junipero Street all the time going 60-70 miles per hour, <br /> whipping around the park that has blind sides to it. She noted that if Independence <br /> Drive is opened up, which would be Lund Ranch Road, the City will not only be breaking <br /> promises that were made to their neighborhood, but also the neighborhood cannot <br /> possibly handle this traffic. She further noted that it is already dangerous, they already <br /> have the police patrolling the neighborhoods, and she and many others have had to <br /> make calls because people just love to go racing up and down Independence Road, <br /> and they were promised no more traffic. <br /> Ms. Saxton stated that she finds it very convenient for people of Bridle Creek and <br /> Sycamore Road to push the idea of Measure PP to include roads. She indicated that <br /> nobody wants additional traffic; however, the difference is, before they bought their <br /> houses, they were told they were getting these roads; they knew perfectlly well they <br /> were getting this development that would be coming through their neighborhoods. She <br /> noted that in contrast, she and her neighborhood were told they would never have to <br /> have this additional traffic because that was a promise made to them over and over <br /> again since 1991. She asked the Commissioners to consider again that when they <br /> make promises to certain neighborhoods, and they break those promises, no one is <br /> ever going to trust them again. <br /> Carol Spain stated that she came before the Commission in January as a member of <br /> the Ventana Hills Steering Committee from its inception and wanted to go on record that <br /> she too supported the fact that a road is not a structure. She indicated that she and her <br /> husband did vote for Measure PP, as did many people of Pleasanton and as many <br /> people that have been in here who have said they voted for that thinking that it included <br /> roads. She noted that she did not believe it included roads, and with that said, she <br /> thinks that without it being stipulated, people voted for it in different ways. <br /> Ms. Spain stated that she believes a road is an infrastructure and not a structure. She <br /> added that whether or not traffic was going to be routed through Ventana Hills and onto <br /> Junipero Street through Mission Hills or not, the fact is that traffic flowing through <br /> Ventana Hills and Mission Hills is something that is extremely important for the <br /> Commission to consider when determining if a road is a structure or not, because she <br /> believes all of the options should be kept open to make sure all of that traffic does not <br /> route through Ventana Hills and Mission Hills. She stated that these roads are not <br /> designed to take additional traffic and, apologizing to the residents of Bridle Creek as <br /> she does not want to push traffic on anybody's neighborhood, added that Sunset Creek <br /> Way and the roads through Bridle Creek were designed to take additional traffic, with <br /> some setbacks and bike lanes. She indicated that this was the intent of the previous <br /> agreements with the City that they had spent a lot of hours discussing with the City to <br /> get these agreements. She added if these agreements are not honored, then this entire <br /> process is just a joke and it does not allow them as neighbors and members of the <br /> community to want to work with the Commission going forward. She asked the <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 13, 2013 Page 17 of 35 <br />