Laserfiche WebLink
with special interests would have told her at the time they were collecting signatures to <br /> deny the road would go through to Lund Ranch II, she would have said they are off <br /> base; but no one ever asked her that. She indicated that it is important to her that the <br /> past decisions by numerous Councils, General Plans, Specific Plans, and PUDs be <br /> honored, and that if the true intent of Measure PP is honored, roads would not be <br /> considered structures. <br /> Chair Blank stated that the Commission is in receipt of an email from someone claiming <br /> to be the author of those sentences. He asked Ms. Ayala if she was suggesting that <br /> she did write this section of Measure PP. <br /> Ms. Ayala replied that it was written by many people. <br /> Chair Blank indicated that he was curious about Ms. Ayala's involvement and asked <br /> Ms. Ayala if she wrote this section of PP which talks about the ridgelines and hillsides <br /> being protected. <br /> Ms. Ayala replied that she was involved from the start of writing Measure PP, and she <br /> assured Chair Blank that roads were never discussed. She added that if roads were in <br /> their interests, they would have put "roads" in there. <br /> William Lincoln stated that he believes most of the talking points have already been <br /> made. He indicated that he lives in Sycamore Heights and have agrees pretty much <br /> with Ms. McGovern's and Mr. O'Connor's comments as well as those of some others. <br /> He indicated that one of the things that confuses him the most is that at the <br /> November 27, 2012 City Council meeting, City staff actually supported the concept that <br /> a road was a structure, and now three months later, staff made a 180-degree turn. He <br /> stated that he is sorry to say that it appears to him that staff is appeasing special <br /> interests of some sort. He noted that the bottom line is that they are being pitted <br /> against other neighborhoods for access to Lund Ranch, and they hope the Commission <br /> you will make the right decision. He added that all those among them who believed in <br /> beautiful hills and quiet and safe neighborhoods voted for Measure PP, and they hope <br /> the Commission does the right thing and try and make everyone happy. <br /> Laurie Saxton stated that she is a typical voter of Pleasanton, and when her husband <br /> and she voted for Measure PP, their understanding was that they specifically were <br /> voting to not have any type of construction up on the ridges, to try to limit the number of <br /> houses up on the ridge because nobody wants to have the ridge discovered. She <br /> added that had she known that this would mean reneging on a promise that was made <br /> to Ventana Hills in 1991 that they would not be burdened with any more additional <br /> traffic, she would not have voted for it. She indicated that they have already allowed a <br /> neighborhood that is not part of their neighborhood to temporarily use their roads, and <br /> she has had to call the police so many times to try to get them to try and make these <br /> people slow down. She noted that these drivers have absolutely no respect for their <br /> neighborhood, and she has followed some of these people up the hill, and they turn <br /> around and tell her that they do not care anything about their neighborhood, that it <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 13, 2013 Page 16 of 35 <br />