My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
011513
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2013 12:39:25 PM
Creation date
1/8/2013 12:39:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EAST PLEASANTON SPECIFIC PLAN <br /> DRAFT VISION STATEMENT IN BULLET FORMAT <br /> East Pleasanton should be a unique and distinct part of the City while blending in seamlessly <br /> with the characteristics of the surrounding areas. This area is differentiated by its lakes, wildlife <br /> habitat, and open land suitable for development. Future uses should entice residents of <br /> Pleasanton to want to visit and stay to enjoy its beauty and uniqueness. The vision for this area <br /> is as follows: <br /> Character <br /> • Character should evolve from the existing open space setting (lakes, natural habitat, and <br /> outlying rural lands and hillsides). <br /> • Scenic views should be protected and lake areas should serve as a visual separator <br /> between Pleasanton and Livermore. Development should orierrl toward and take <br /> advantage of the lake environment <br /> Land Use <br /> • Land uses should benefit the entire community, integrate with surrounding <br /> neighborhoods, balance development with infrastructure costs, and be flexible in order to <br /> allow for the changing community needs. <br /> • Plan area development should generally be a low intensity mix of uses (such as open <br /> space, park, recreation, trails, a variety of housing types and densities, public and/or <br /> private schools, limited local serving and specialty retail, office and light industrial), <br /> arranged around a central community focus area. <br /> • Development should be part of a balanced, city-wide approach to meeting General Plan <br /> policy guidance and housing goals. <br /> • Land use should take into account school needs, airport noise and flood hazard potential. <br /> • The relocation of the PGS transfer station and/or the City's Operation Services Center <br /> should be considered if cost effective. <br /> Open Space/Sustainability <br /> • Open space should serve two primary functions: it should be protected for its habitat and <br /> scenic values; and it should help to meet the recreational needs of the community, <br /> including active and passive recreation and inter-connected trails within a safe <br /> environment. <br /> • The use of open space should also be coordinated with East Bay Regional Park District to <br /> optimize park functions. <br /> • A major focus of development should be on sustainability in terms of environmental <br /> resources, energy, and economic and fiscal balance. <br /> Circulation <br /> • The circulation system should minimize or reduce traffic congestion and noise on the <br /> outlying City streets and neighborhoods. <br /> • Sub-neighborhoods should be interconnected with tree-lined streets, bike paths and <br /> pedestrian trails, with trail linkages to the out-lying lakes, parks, neighborhoods, schools <br /> and the regional trail system. <br /> • The El Charro Road design should allow for the uninterrupted planning of land uses and <br /> neighborhoods within the Plan area. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.