My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
011513
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2013 12:39:25 PM
Creation date
1/8/2013 12:39:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 1 <br /> EAST PLEASANTON SPECIFIC PLAN <br /> DRAFT VISION STATEMENT IN PARAGRAPH FORMAT <br /> The vision for the EPSP area is that its future character evolve from the existing open space <br /> setting (lakes, natural habitat, and outlying rural lands and hillsides). Scenic views to and from <br /> the Plan area should be protected. Lake areas should serve as a visual separator between <br /> Pleasanton and Livermore, and development should orient toward and take advantage of the <br /> lake environment. <br /> Land use planning should benefit the entire community, integrate with surrounding <br /> neighborhoods and outlying specific plan areas, balance development with infrastructure costs, <br /> and be flexible to allow for the changing community needs. Development should generally be a <br /> low intensity mix of uses, arranged around a central community focus area. Potential land uses <br /> that may be appropriate at certain locations within the Plan area might include: open space, park <br /> and recreation, trails, a variety of housing types and densities, public and/or private schools, <br /> limited local serving and specialty retail, plazas, office and light industrial. Development should <br /> be part of a balanced, city-wide approach to meeting General Plan policy guidance and housing <br /> goals. It should also be sensitive to school needs and responsive to airport noise, and flood <br /> hazard potential. If cost effective, a relocation of the PGS transfer station and/or the City's <br /> Operations Service Center may be possible. <br /> Open space should serve two primary functions: it should be protected for its habitat and scenic <br /> values; and it should help to meet the recreational needs of the community, including active and <br /> passive recreation and inter-connected trails within a safe environment. The use of open space <br /> should also be coordinated with the East Bay Regional Park District to optimize park functions <br /> (including sports fields and passive recreation), and trails in a safe and well-maintained manner <br /> consistent with City park standards. A major focus of development should be on sustainability in <br /> terms of environmental resources, energy, and economic and fiscal balance. <br /> The circulation system should minimize or reduce traffic congestion and noise on the outlying <br /> City streets and neighborhoods. Sub-neighborhoods should be conveniently interconnected with <br /> tree-lined streets, bike paths and pedestrian trails, with trail linkages to the out-lying lakes, parks, <br /> neighborhoods, schools and regional trail system. The El Charro Road design should allow for <br /> the uninterrupted planning of land uses and neighborhoods. The potential extension of Boulder <br /> Street into the EPSP area could help to relieve traffic on Busch Road. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.