Laserfiche WebLink
The proposal also includes a development plan for the following: <br /> - a new 4,000 square-foot, single-story, single-family residence with an 864 <br /> square-foot, attached garage; <br /> - a new detached 1,195 square-foot, second unit with a detached, 480 square- <br /> foot, garage; <br /> - a second detached garage of 960 square feet for storage of agricultural <br /> equipment; <br /> - stormwater improvements; and <br /> - landscaping improvements. <br /> The proposed development would have minor grading associated with the foundation <br /> work and utility trenching for the new structures. The site contains existing flat pad <br /> areas for construction. All previous grading was done with permits and approvals from <br /> Alameda County. <br /> The current development proposal and future proposals to develop the properties would <br /> be subject to the standards listed in the Site Development Standards section of the <br /> Planning Commission staff report. Both lots would continue to utilize Alisal Road and <br /> the existing driveway for access. <br /> If the PUD Development Plan is approved by the City Council, the applicants would <br /> follow with an application for a minor subdivision map to subdivide the property into two <br /> separate parcels. All development approvals by the City prior to review by LAFCo for <br /> annexation will be contingent on the LAFCo annexation approval and recordation, as <br /> stated in the recommended conditions of approval. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> The proposed project was reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2012. <br /> By a 5 to 0 vote, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the project, <br /> subject to the conditions shown in Attachment 1. The Planning Commission meeting <br /> minutes are attached for the Council's information (Attachment 7). <br /> The Planning Commission stated that the project was well designed and the proposed <br /> density was appropriate for this site. No one from the public spoke on the item. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Staff believes that the proposed density, site plan, and design guidelines are <br /> appropriate for the subject site. A comprehensive discussion of the land use <br /> application is attached in the October 10, 2012, Planning Commission staff report <br /> (Attachment 4), including General Plan and Happy Valley Specific Plan conformity, the <br /> Urban Growth Boundary, the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Special Studies Zone, the Fault <br /> Rupture Hazard Investigation Report (geotechnical study) and peer review, tree report, <br /> site configuration, site development standards, the proposed architecture of the new <br /> structures, utilities, Inclusionary Zoning, the Growth Management Ordinance, Green <br /> Building requirements, and the annexation process. <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />