Laserfiche WebLink
continuation. In addition, many of the returned dollars came with conditions auached as <br />to how they could be used. <br /> <br />In addition to the current economic climate and State budget impacts, the City has <br />matured to the point that it is nearing General Plan build ont. As indicated in our recently <br />approved Growth Management Plan, over 84% of the 29,000 residential units allowed by <br />the City's General Plan have been constructed and Commercial/Office/Industrial <br />development is also nearing capacity. As anticipated, developer fees will decline in the <br />future, which currently funds some or all of our capital improvement projects. <br />Reductions in construction-related fees that fund many development/construction related <br />operations (e.g. building inspection, planning, public works, etc) have also been <br />anticipated. While the loss of these funds has been planned in our long-term financial <br />projections and our fiscal policies, it is important to recognize that our remaining major <br />sources of revenue -- sales taxes and property taxes - will also not be increasing in the <br />future at the pace they have increased in the past. Sales taxes and hotel taxes will also <br />require careful monitoring in the short term due to the weak economy and State budget <br />deficit. Fortunately, the City has been planning for build-ont for some time now and <br />financial reserves and operational decisions, such as the use of limited term employees, <br />were put in place to address this situation. <br /> <br />In addition to the weak economy, State budget deficit, and planning for General Plan <br />build-out, there are three factors that are driving personnel costs upwards over the long- <br />term. These factors are: workers' compensation; medical premiums; and the City's <br />required contribution rates to the State's Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) <br />including the recent improvements to retirement benefits. All three factors are expected <br />to increase at rates substantially higher than inflation. <br /> <br />In anticipation of the unknown of the State Budget and lingering economic woes, staff <br />conducted an extensive midyear review of the 2002-03 fiscal year budget, and identified <br />budget reductions that could be made without impacting service levels. Staff updated the <br />City's Replacement Plan and assembled a budget for fiscal years 2003-04 and 2004-05 <br />that is balanced, provides for anticipated Capital Improvement Program (CIP) <br />contributions, and provides a Temporary Recession Reserve of $2.4 million to help offset <br />impacts from the economy and State Budget. <br /> <br />III. SUMMARY OF 2002-03/2003-04 OPERATING BUDGET <br /> <br />A. OVERVIEW <br /> <br />1. Total Revenue: All Operating Budget Funds <br /> <br />Total annual operating revenue for all Funds for fiscal year 2003-04 is estimated to be <br />$151.4 million or 1.6% more than the fiscal year 2002-03 projection of <br />$149.0 million. For 2004-05, the projection is $161.0 million, or 6.3% higher than <br />the 2003-04 projection. <br /> <br /> <br />