My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
112712 Special Meeting
>
02 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2012 11:48:18 AM
Creation date
11/19/2012 11:47:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/27/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
02 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P11-0824(Downtown Hospitality Guidelines), P12-0798(Pleasanton Municipal Code Amendments) <br /> Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br /> -- - - --- Less Then <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Issues <br /> Transportation and Traffic <br /> Would the project <br /> a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy j I I I <br /> establishing measures of effectiveness for the <br /> performance of the circulation system, taking into account <br /> all modes of transportation including mass transit and <br /> non-motorized travel and relevant components of the <br /> circulation system, including but not limited to <br /> intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian <br /> and bicycle paths, and mass transit? <br /> b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management I I I� <br /> program, including but not limited to level of service <br /> standards and travel demand measures, or other <br /> standards established by the county congestion <br /> management agency for designated roads or highways? <br /> c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, Including either I 1 [ X I I <br /> an increase in traffic levels or a change in location those <br /> results in substantial safety risks? <br /> d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature <br /> X <br /> (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or <br /> incompatible uses(e.g., farm equipment)? <br /> e) Result in inadequate emergency access? <br /> lXI <br /> f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ❑ X <br /> regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or <br /> otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such <br /> facilities? <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> a-f. intersections a <br /> tions shown in the Downtown SpecificPlantfromttthe City wideeLOSP <br /> e c D <br /> standard. <br /> Emergency access is adequate Downtown and is not anticipated to be impacted as <br /> a result of the project. The City of Pleasanton Police Department reviews special <br /> event traffic flow and safety and will continue to do so if the project is approved. <br /> 51 <br /> November 2, 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.