Laserfiche WebLink
P11-0824(Downtown Hospitality Guidelines), P12-0798(Pleasanton Municipal Code Amendments) <br /> Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br /> 5.8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING <br /> No physical changes, such as demolition, grading, trenching, or construction are proposed <br /> as part of the project. No changes related to hazardous material transport are proposed. <br /> STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br /> For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the <br /> proposed project would: <br /> • Result in exposing people to existing contaminated soil during construction <br /> activities; <br /> • Result in exposing people to asbestos containing materials; <br /> • Result in exposing people to contaminated groundwater if dewatening activities take <br /> place. <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Leas Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues(Cont.) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Hazards And Hazardous Materials <br /> Would the project. <br /> a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the n j El <br /> environment through the routine transport, use, or <br /> disposal of hazardous materials? <br /> b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the © 0 <br /> environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and <br /> accident conditions involving the release of hazardous <br /> materials into the environment? <br /> c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or 0 © 0 <br /> acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste with-in <br /> one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? <br /> d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of n 0 <br /> hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to <br /> Government Code Section 85962.5 and, as a result, <br /> would it create a significant hazard to the public or the <br /> environment? <br /> e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, n ❑ ^1 n <br /> where such a plan has not been adopted, within two <br /> miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the <br /> project result in a safety hazard for people residing or <br /> working in the project area? <br /> November 2,2012 30 <br />