My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
112012
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2012 12:46:35 PM
Creation date
11/16/2012 12:46:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/20/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton Lower In:ome Housing Fee Study <br /> Proposal September 18, 2012 <br /> While the focus of this initial effort will be on the impacts associated with the construction of new <br /> ownership housing, it may be that the workers generated by those for-sale homes' occupants <br /> can be appropriately and more cost-effectively housed in rental units. As such, the impacts will <br /> be attributable to for-sale housing, but the demands may be met through rental housing. EPS <br /> will work with City staff to determine appropriate assumptions regarding the tenure of affordable <br /> units, as well as project characteristics such as densities, unit sizes, parking types and ratios, <br /> etc. <br /> Step 3• Compute Impact Fee per Market Rate Unit <br /> The third step is to calculate the aggregate subsidy required to produce housing affordable and <br /> appropriate for those new worker households and allocate that aggregate subsidy back to the <br /> market-rate project driving that demand. EPS will calculate a technically derived amount for the <br /> maximum justifiable impact fee, consistent with this nexus logic. The results will include <br /> different nexus-based fees for housing units at various price levels because the household <br /> spending and job creation associated by such households will vary by their income, as <br /> represented by home prices. EPS will also illustrate the equivalent number of units required at <br /> different income levels, which may be used as a standard for allowing developers to address <br /> their impacts through provision of units on site rather than payment of the impact fee. It is <br /> likely that the nexus-based impacts and resulting impact fees or unit requirements will be <br /> different than the City's current or past inclusionary housing requirements. <br /> EPS will present the results of the nexus analysis in a draft report for City staff review. Upon <br /> receipt of comments from City staff and stakeholders, EPS will issue a revised version of the <br /> report for initial public workshops and hearings, and will provide a final version for City adoption. <br /> Task 2.2: Rental Housing Nexus Impact and Fee Analysis <br /> The process of establishing the nexus between market-rate and affordable housing for rental <br /> projects is very much the same as it is for ownership projects: EPS will use recent market data <br /> to estimate the incomes required to rent market-rate apartments of various sizes (1 bedroom, <br /> 2 bedroom, etc.) in Pleasanton, the spending patterns of households with those income levels, C <br /> the jobs and worker households created by such spending, the number of below-market-rate <br /> units required for such workers, and the subsidy required to provide those units. Then, EPS will <br /> convert those subsidy requirements into a maximum fee level for each of several unit sizes or <br /> types, as justified by the nexus analysis. <br /> The results of the rental housing nexus analysis will be presented in a draft report, which will be <br /> revised upon incorporation of comments from City staff and stakeholders, and finalized before <br /> City adoption. <br /> Task 2.3: Nonresidential Nexus Impact and Fee Analysis <br /> EPS will update the City's Lower Income Housing Fee for C/0/I development. The nexus (i.e., <br /> linkage) between new nonresidential development and the demand for affordable housing will be <br /> derived by preparing employment density and compensation estimates of future employees for <br /> several nonresidential land use types (e.g., retail, office, industrial, lodging, etc.). New <br /> household formation resulting from new employment will be categorized by income category <br /> (moderate, low, very low) to estimate total demand. These calculations include consideration of <br /> local trends in household formation (e.g., size and location of household formation). The <br /> Economic&Planning Systems, Inc. 6 N:\noposMs j2lna's2b,27HeasamomPU isp,ancI nzmr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.