Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> City of Pleasanton Lower Income Housing Fee Study <br /> Proposal September 1 S, 2012 <br /> In this task, EPS will document the current and recommended changes to the fee calculations, <br /> including quantitative illustrations as appropriate as well as text reflecting the theory and <br /> implementation implications accompanying each recommendation. Following City staff review of <br /> the draft document, EPS proposes to conduct one (1) targeted stakeholder meeting (to be <br /> organized by City staff) to discuss the merits of these alternative approaches. We believe it is <br /> • <br /> important to conduct these discussions in advance of updating the fee calculations, so that <br /> • consensus can be sought on the theory without being swayed by the resulting maximum fee <br /> amounts. <br /> Task 2: Calculate Residential and C/O/I Lower Income Housing Fees <br /> The Task 2 work effort describes the completion of nexus studies to support the revised Lower <br /> Income Housing Fees. <br /> Task 2.1: Calculate Nexus-Based Impacts for Ownership Housing <br /> If To meet the most conservative interpretations of the Patterson case, EPS will provide analysis of <br /> the nexus between development of for-sale market-rate housing and the demand for affordable <br /> housing units. The process involves three general steps, as described below. <br /> Step 1: Compute Demand for Affordable Housing Generated by Market Rate ijnits <br /> The first step is to estimate the impact that the addition of market-rate housing has on job <br /> creation and household formation. Using data regarding consumer expenditure patterns and <br /> wage levels for specific types of business, EPS will estimate the demand for local goods and <br /> services generated by the addition of market-rate housing and its occupants, convert that <br /> demand to a number for local jobs and worker households, and estimate the number of those <br /> worker households who cannot afford to pay market-rate housing prices. These figures are <br /> driven by the incomes of the households occupying the market-rate housing--the higher the cost <br /> of the housing, the higher the occupants' income, and the more spending and job creation is <br /> tt expected. EPS will calculate impacts for a range of home prices to Illustrate these effects. <br /> Step 2: Affordability Gap Analysis <br /> The second step is to determine whether and how much subsidy is required to provide new <br /> housing units for worker households of various income levels (e.g., moderate, low, and very <br /> low). Determination of a required subsidy amount involves an estimation of the costs of <br /> development (construction, land, fees, required financial returns, etc.), as well as an estimation <br /> of the prices at which the units are affordable to income-qualified households. EPS will provide <br /> detailed Initial assumptions and calculations to City staff for review and comment and make <br /> adjustments as appropriate. With assistance from the City to identify appropriate participants <br /> (for-profit and nonprofit developers, etc.), EPS will conduct conversations with these <br /> stakeholders to review the assumptions and calculations on which the impact fees are based. <br /> Following these initial discussions and further consultation with City staff, EPS will make <br /> adjustments to the assumptions and calculations as may be appropriate. Based on calculations <br /> in this step, if the development costs are higher than the allowable prices, a subsidy or financing <br /> gap is identified and quantified. <br /> Economic& Planning Systems, Inc. 5 .c1PI0,M.zi.1,2101105\u1„+Peesamumu,iumrt11"nn.m, <br />