Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Dolan directed the Council's attention to minor changes on page 90, which includes an <br /> explanation of how the City's fees relate to development, and page 97, which includes additional <br /> analysis proving that the City's growth management ordinance does not affect the cost of <br /> housing or overall production of housing. <br /> Councilmember McGovern expressed concern that the Growth Management Committee had <br /> not had an opportunity to review this information before hand. While staff maintaines that the <br /> language is just a summary of existing provisions, she did not believe the set:-aside of 50 units <br /> per year for affordable housing or the included definition of affordable housing projects was a <br /> part of the current growth management ordinance or something the committee had discussed. <br /> Mr. Fialho assured her that the 50 unit set-aside is in the ordinance. <br /> Mr. Dolan said the portion related to "affordable housing projects" as having 100% affordability <br /> is not verbatim, but is information provided by staff relative to historical decisions of the Council. <br /> Mr. Fialho said staff could confirm that as part of the Council's action this evening to remove the <br /> definition if not included in the existing ordinance. He reiterated that staff was simply attempting <br /> to briefly summarize what is a very complicated ordinance that predates most of the settlement <br /> agreement with Urban Habitat. During those negotiations, it was very clear that the City cannot <br /> discriminate against 100% affordable projects and that this must be made clear in the City's <br /> policy documents. Based on comments from the Council and a brief policy provision elsewhere <br /> in the Housing Element, staff agreed to take deletion of that sentence under consideration. <br /> Mr. Dolan directed the Council's attention to page 105, which includes an argument making the <br /> case that the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance does not adversely affect the cost or <br /> production of housing. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan referred to the first paragraph on page 89, which states that "Projects <br /> complying with the Development Standards and Design Guidelines will be approved." Mr. Dolan <br /> explained that this gets to the heart of the "by right" issue the Council has been concerned with <br /> for some time. HCD really insisted on this language and staff's approach with this has been to <br /> achieve the desired discretion and protections within the standards and guidelines rather than <br /> going to war on this. Staff and HCD worked closely to reach a compromise on this and after <br /> review, HCD essentially agreed to certify the Housing Element if this language is adopted. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan asked and Mr. Dolan confirmed that this language was not in the <br /> Housing Element submitted in February. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan asked what is required in order to comply with the settlement <br /> agreement with respect to timing. Mr. Fialho said the City accomplished all requirements by <br /> adopting the standards and guidelines in September, submitting the Housing Element by a date <br /> certain and working towards certification in the September/October timeframe. <br /> Councilmember McGovern reiterated the concerns she raised at previous meetings relative to <br /> open space for multi-family residential development. She asked and staff confirmed that the <br /> Council has the ability to amend the standards and guidelines, if needed. She asked staff to <br /> describe the City's ability to meter growth under the new regulations pertaining to growth <br /> management ordinances and programs. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 12 October 2, 2012 <br />