Laserfiche WebLink
some cases, the true costs are passed on to ratepayers and in some cases they are borne out <br /> of PGS' profit. <br /> Councilmember McGovern asked that staff look at this closely, particularly when the City does <br /> not assume the full cost of benefits for its own employees. She asked and staff confirm PGS <br /> offers a senior discount, which staff believed to be 15%. <br /> Councilmember McGovern referred to the CPI adjustments and asked if those are granted <br /> every year. <br /> Mr. Bocian explained that when rates are adjusted every three to four years, PGS provides the <br /> City with audits that look at arrears as well as projections of future costs and oftentimes, those <br /> projections are based strictly on the cost of living increase. If the true cost turns out to be less <br /> than estimate, the remaining funds go into a holding account and offset rates in future years. If <br /> the true costs exceed estimates, there is a deficit in those accounts and measures are taken to <br /> fill that gap through the next rate cycle. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan thanked Mr. Wolf as well as staff for all their work. He said the fact that <br /> twelve of the fourteen member agencies signed on with this immediately is a testament to the <br /> effort Stopwaste.org made to work through the issues identified. He supporteo the ordinance for <br /> several reasons, including consistency with neighboring agencies and the need for a more <br /> robust commercial program. The revenue from high-value materials currently going to the <br /> landfill could be used to support economic activity within Pleasanton. He agreed with the staff <br /> report that the City's Climate Action Plan contains some very aggressive goals, a number of <br /> which this will help to meet and which perhaps the City would not be able to meet without the <br /> ordinance. From a practical standpoint, he noted that Stopwaste.org is considering placing <br /> conditions on future Measure D funds that would otherwise disqualify the City. Based on its <br /> benefit to the community, the relatively low or non-existent costs when compared to <br /> implementing AB 341, and the language that allows the city to retain its local control, he said he <br /> could support the ordinance. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio echoed his comments, particularly as related to the Climate Action <br /> Plan. She acknowledged concerns over local control but also said that the layering of <br /> ordinances is one of the things that cause government to be so cumbersome. She agreed that <br /> Pleasanton should not reinvent the wheel in. Based on the Climate Action Plan goals, potential <br /> loss of Measure D funds and the idea that this makes the process a bit less cumbersome, she <br /> too supported the ordinance. <br /> Councilmember McGovern said she felt this was a positive step in the right direction and <br /> something she could support. She recalled that recycling in this community actually started with <br /> local schools. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio noted that schools are now using recycling as a way to augment <br /> their own budgets and that her own school won a bus for being the "greenest school in <br /> America." <br /> Vice-Mayor Thorne said he is well known as an extreme advocate of local control and in this <br /> instance it appears to him that enough of that has been retained. His primary concern after that <br /> relates to complying with AB 341 in the most efficient way possible, which this opting in to this <br /> ordinance would seem to accomplish. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 7 of 12 October 2, 2012 <br />