My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
082112
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2012 11:17:16 AM
Creation date
8/14/2012 2:50:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/21/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Issue Changes to Standards and Guidelines <br /> floors, as well as design features to deter <br /> residential neighbors from cutting through <br /> their property. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> The adoption of the 2012 Housing Element was part of the project which was described <br /> in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report certified by the City Council on <br /> January 4, 2012. The development standards and design guidelines described in <br /> Attachment 1 constitute implementation of Program 9.7 of the Housing Element and are <br /> therefore consistent with the Housing Element project as described and analyzed in the <br /> certified SEIR. Therefore, no further environmental assessment need be conducted to <br /> adopt these standards and guidelines. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Public Hearing notices were sent to all property owners within 1,000 feet of each of the <br /> nine sites. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Letters and an e-mail were received from owners or potential developers of Sites 6 (Auf <br /> der Maur) and Site 8 (CarrAmerica/California Center), and a neighbor to Site 6, as <br /> shown in Attachment 6. These communications have requested changes to the <br /> standards and design guidelines, some of which have been incorporated into the <br /> attached draft. These letters also included requests for changes to the standards and <br /> guidelines that the developers feel are necessary to accommodate future projects. Staff <br /> recommends that these exceptions be considered when a project application is made. <br /> At that time these issues can be considered in the context of the proposed development <br /> and as exceptions to standards or as an alternatives method of meeting the intent of the <br /> document where the strict application of a guideline is impractical or undesirable. <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.