My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
082112
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2012 11:17:16 AM
Creation date
8/14/2012 2:50:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/21/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Issue Changes to Standards and Guidelines <br /> Do not consider paseos as open space. Staff recommends that the City's existing Usable Open <br /> Space requirements be followed (PMC 18.84.170). Under <br /> these requirements, if the paseo includes a minimum area <br /> of at least 300 s.f., and has no dimension less than 15 feet, <br /> and is planted or paved, it would count as open space. In <br /> the absence of other standards or guidelines these <br /> requirements would apply to all multifamily projects; <br /> increasing the requirements could have an impact on <br /> project feasibility. <br /> Require Bay Friendly landscaping and A new development standard, A9.1 has been added to <br /> water conserving irrigation methods. require water efficient landscaping consistent with State law <br /> and Bay Friendly Basics which were adopted by the City <br /> Council in June 2012. <br /> Concern that private open space area can This is consistent with the City's existing Usable Open <br /> be counted towards group open space at Space Requirements in the Municipal Code and staff does <br /> a rate of 1 s.f. of private open space not recommend a change to that. <br /> equaling 2 s.f. of group open space. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION <br /> Attachment 1 dated August 21, 2012, includes the changes detailed above, and also <br /> includes amendments accepted by the Planning Commission, as well as the <br /> recommendation of Planning Commission for some additional changes. These include <br /> the following: <br /> Issue Changes to Standards and Guidelines <br /> Per letter of May 10, 2012, (included in "infeasible and/or" is deleted from last sentence under <br /> Attachment 6), the representative for the Purpose on p. 4. Text is added to Vision Statement after <br /> CarrAmerica/California Center site the third paragraph. <br /> requested that it be recognized that all the <br /> sites are different in their configuration, <br /> etc, and therefore exceptions to the <br /> Standards and Guidelines should be <br /> allowed based on unique circumstances <br /> and conditions. Additionally, delete <br /> "infeasible" in Purpose as this is an <br /> inappropriate standard for providing an <br /> exception to a guideline. <br /> Clarify that other regulations and A sentence has been added to Section D. Other Guidelines <br /> guidelines in addition to the draft proposal and Regulations Applying to Development on p. 7. <br /> may pertain to the future residential <br /> development of the sites. <br /> In an e-mail of July 9, 2012, (included in Text was added to Appendix B, p. 59 to address these <br /> Attachment 6) a property owner next to issues. <br /> the CM Capital property (Site 9) <br /> requested a larger setback area with no <br /> structures and stepping back of upper <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.