My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
071712 Special Meeting
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2012 12:08:00 PM
Creation date
7/12/2012 12:07:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/17/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> There has been a significant growth in the demand for recreation services that is <br /> requiring a service assessment. In addition, the scope of recreational programming has <br /> been changing such that it is now defined not so much in terms of specific leisure <br /> activities, but in terms of meaningful experiences that contrast with work and school <br /> obligations, enhance personal skills and increase an awareness of the larger <br /> community. To address this situation, the City Council's Annual Work Plan includes a <br /> Parks and Recreation Master Plan that would summarize themes, trends, and <br /> community priorities, assess available resources, review existing and anticipated <br /> demographic conditions, and provide strategies for parks, recreation programs and <br /> open space needs. <br /> To address the City Council's priority, staff circulated a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) <br /> for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan on March 12, 2012. To review proposals <br /> received, staff formed an eight member screening committee comprised of staff from <br /> both the Community Services and Community Development Department(s) and two (2) <br /> members from the Parks and Recreation Commission. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> A total of ten proposals were received in response to the City's RFC). All proposals <br /> were reviewed by the screening committee and personal interviews were conducted <br /> with five firms. In accordance with the RFQ, proposal evaluations included master plan <br /> experience, overall project approach, individual qualifications of project team members <br /> and project scope. Based on these criteria, the selection committee identified RJM <br /> Design Group, Inc. as the most qualified to complete the project. Overall, the committee <br /> felt that RJM had the most relative master planning experience (25+ years), and that <br /> RJM's approach to community outreach and how to obtain input from stakeholders, best <br /> aligned with the cities' approach. <br /> Staff and RJM Design have complete contract review, including project scope and an <br /> agreement is presented for City Council review and approval. <br /> As indicated in Exhibit A to the recommended Agreement, the proposed Master Plan <br /> process includes the following: <br /> • Background Research, Demographics and Trend Analysis to provide valuable <br /> building blocks for assessing existing and future community need for recreation <br /> programs and facilities. <br /> • Inventory of Parks, Facilities and Programs looking at both frequency of use, ages <br /> served attendance and other pertinent details. <br /> • A public involvement process including stakeholder interviews, sports organization <br /> questionnaire, community telephone survey, and public workshops. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.