01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Councilmember McGovern expressed concern with the concept that private open space, such as a balcony, could be considered equivalent to 2 square feet of community open space. Considering that a balcony serves one family, where as open space serves all those who might not have a balcony, it would seem to be taking from those who are already less fortunate in terms of space. She inquired about the amount of parkland required per 1,000 people under the General Plan, to which Mr. Dolan responded "5 acres." Mr. Dolan clarified that the requirement applies citywide, not to each development. The question is more a matter of whether there exists parkland to service this particular type of development at this location. Councilmember McGovern asked that park space be given strong consideration when looking at the guidelines. She reiterated her concerns regarding traffic and the level of service surrounding the BART site, particularly on Valley Avenue and Stoneridge Drive. Councilmember Cook-Kallio acknowledged the point and said this makes it increasingly important that the East Pleasanton Specific Plan identify a connection between El Charro Road and Stanley Drive, which would relieve some of the potential congestion. Commissioner Narum asked if the requirement for drought tolerant, Bay-friendly landscaping would preclude grass, which she found concerning. Mr. Fialho clarified that it limits grass in areas such as walkways, not active green space for parks and play areas. Mayor Hosterman asked that staff include Commissioner Olson's suggestion regarding economic feasibility. She also supported Chair Pentin's comments regarding cyclists and the connection of Iron Horse Trail through the BART property. She strongly encouraged the Commission to participate in the Council's future discussions on the matter. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Karen Diaz City Clerk City Council Minutes Page 11 of 11 June 5,2012