Laserfiche WebLink
demonstrate that Walmart is damaging to local economies and workers, that it receives massive <br /> taxpayer subsidies, and utilizes unscrupulous business practices and market power to squeeze <br /> suppliers in order to gain an edge over competitors. This is a corporate takeover of democracy, an <br /> attack on the middle and working classes, and a redistribution of wealth. There are also allegations of <br /> the bribery of public officials on a massive scale in order to dominate the market share. Once the <br /> competition is crushed, Walmart's "everyday low prices" will vanish and the very citizens who rely on <br /> them will be most affected. <br /> He said this is about more than Walmart; it is about how City policy has already damaged the local <br /> economy. Pleasanton is oversaturated with grocery stores, as evidenced in the economic study <br /> prepared by the City and the sale of the only locally owned grocery store close on the heels of a second <br /> Safeway moving into town. The introduction of Walmart and the market competition it creates will mean <br /> employees making minimum wage without benefits, less disposable income, fewer purchases at local <br /> businesses and the general transition of spending power out of Pleasanton. He sympathized with the <br /> neighbors of Vintage Hills Shopping Center who would like to see a grocery store at Meadows Plaza, <br /> but said it would come at the expense of other neighbors and property owners when their own <br /> neighborhood store closes. <br /> In its zeal to be a mouthpiece for Walmart and the Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce, the Pleasanton <br /> Weekly has done a real disservice to the community by not presenting the entire picture. The public <br /> raised important issues at the last meeting about Walmart's campaign contributions and the Mexican <br /> bribery scandal. He had requested additional information on both issues and continued the meeting to <br /> provide time for answers; unfortunately, the Council has refused to respond to these requests. <br /> He said there is a clear and legal path to an alternative. The Council can adopt a moratorium tonight on <br /> new grocery stores and pass an emergency grocery and retail ordinance that would require economic <br /> and environmental analysis as well as a public hearing prior to approving any new grocery stores. The <br /> Council can also pass an ordinance requiring any company that is indicted on or convicted of violations <br /> of the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or any other federal or state law, to promptly close <br /> operations and vacate Pleasanton. He reviewed both ideas with the City Attorney and, while there are <br /> complexities, the Council can legally exercise these options. <br /> Mayor Hosterman opened the public hearing. <br /> Leslie Jones agreed with Councilmember Sullivan that anyone coming before the Council should have <br /> the right to speak, regardless of whether they have done so before. She said the issue is not one of <br /> liking or disliking Walmart; it is about the principles of free markets, property rights, and limited <br /> government. She disagreed that this is a corporate takeover of democracy and said it is a massive <br /> regulation upon businesses, residents and taxpayers. Free enterprise is what democracy and local <br /> communities are about. Every time that government prevents a company from doing business in <br /> Pleasanton, the tax base is depleted and will ultimately lead to the loss of essential services. She asked <br /> the Council to allow Walmart to do business in Pleasanton and to allow the consumers to determine <br /> who will stay in business. <br /> Mayor Hosterman closed the public hearing and noted that every email, letter and phone call received <br /> by staff and the Council have been heard and is a part of the public record. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio said there has been a lot of talk about democracy. Democratic rights are <br /> predicated on the rule of law and what distinguishes this from other countries is that all parties have <br /> equal protection. Walmart is a business that has undertaken the process outlined by this Council and it <br /> would be unconstitutional for the Council to single out one company based on a general distaste for <br /> their business practices. She believed the Zoning Administrator acted in accordance with the law and <br /> that the Council is bound by that same law. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 12 May 15, 2012 <br />