Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION: It was m/s by Cook-Kallio/Thorne to approve Consent Calendar as recommended and as <br /> noted. Motion carried by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC <br /> 13. Presentation of a proclamation proclaiming May 11 to 20 "Affordable Housing Week" <br /> Becky Dennis, Vice-Chair of Tri-Valley Housing Opportunity Center Board of Directors, provided a brief <br /> history on Affordable Housing Week. She stated that this year's celebration would include an event at <br /> Firehouse Arts Theater for Tri-Valley employers to familiarize themselves with the excellent programs <br /> and opportunities available to assist their employees. <br /> 14. Public Comment <br /> Fred Norman reported that 107 American military men and women have been killed in Afghanistan this <br /> year. He asked the Council to take a stand in opposition before more are sent to die. <br /> Cathe Norman read the names of the 34 American military killed in Afghanistan since the last Council <br /> meeting. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 15. Continued council deliberation and action regarding the appeal by Councilmember Sullivan of the <br /> Planning Commission's decision denying the appeal of Angela Joe-Willmes and Linda Martin, <br /> thereby upholding the Director of Community Development's approval of a zoning certificate to <br /> operate a supermarket as a permitted use within the existing building located at 3112 Santa Rita <br /> Road, and within the hours of operation and delivery limits as set forth in the existing Conditions <br /> of Approval for PUD-84 (Ordinances 1035, 1165 & 1214 and Planning Commission Resolution <br /> 2691) <br /> Mayor Hosterman stated that the Council took public testimony and closed the public hearing at the last <br /> meeting, before continuing deliberation to this session. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan requested that the Mayor reopen the public hearing and allow all members of <br /> the public who are present to provide comment. The Council deliberated briefly, with the majority <br /> stating no interest in rehashing the comments of the previous meeting but allowing those who did not <br /> have an opportunity to speak then to do so now. Councilmember Sullivan objected on principle and <br /> said that in 15 years of attending meetings, the Council has never denied the public an opportunity to <br /> speak regardless of whether they had done so previously. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan presented his position as the appellant. He stated that this application goes <br /> beyond the issue of simple land use permits; it raises much larger concerns about the local economy, <br /> the influence of business and corporate power over our government and lives, and the ability of public <br /> citizens to exercise their democratic rights. If not appealed, this decision would have allowed Walmart <br /> to open without any notice, public comment, or review by any City commission or the Council. This is <br /> precisely what Walmart has done in many other communities because they know that a controversial <br /> public process may jeopardize the project at hand and while legal, it is clearly undemocratic. <br /> He stated that despite what local media reports have claimed, his opposition to Walmart is rooted in the <br /> undoubted impact on local economy rather than some personal vendetta. Documented facts <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 12 May 15,2012 <br />