My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENTS 03-07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
060512
>
14 ATTACHMENTS 03-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2012 12:26:04 PM
Creation date
5/31/2012 12:25:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/5/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
14 ATTACHMENS 03-07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 5 <br /> May 10,2012 <br /> Ms.Janice Stern <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> Planning Department <br /> 200 Old Bernal Avenue <br /> Pleasanton,CA 94566 <br /> Re: Comments to the City of Pleasanton's, Housing Site Development Standards and Design <br /> Guidelines,Discussion Draft,April 2,2012 <br /> Dear Janice, <br /> We are the owners of Site 8,CarrAmerica,as shown within the Housing Site Development Standards and <br /> Design Guidelines, Discussion Draft,dated,April 2,2012 ("Residential Guidelines"). On behalf of the <br /> entire RREEF team, I would like to thank you,the City of Pleasanton and all parties who have been <br /> involved with preparing the Residential Guidelines. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on <br /> these Residential Guidelines. Our team, including RREEF,Sares Regis Group of Northern California, <br /> Dahlin Group Architects, BKF Engineers,and Gates and Associates,has tremendous experience with <br /> multifamily housing and retail development at the 30 DUA range and above. Based on our many years <br /> of experience working with these building types and our knowledge of mixed-use development,our <br /> comments to the Residential Guidelines are as follows: <br /> 1) Page 4 and 5, Part 1, Introduction, B.Vision Statement <br /> Comment: The Vision Statement applies generally to all nine rezoned sites. The sites are all <br /> very different in their configuration,size,surrounding geography, neighborhood context, <br /> available community amenities and resultant opportunities and constraints. This Vision <br /> Statement is filled with many specifics that are intended to provide examples that <br /> individually,or in concert with others,add up to a"quality"neighborhood. In theory,the <br /> menu of amenities should be re-characterized in a way so as not to appear uniformly <br /> mandatory for all sites(all sites are not appropriate for a pool or water feature for example). <br /> We request that the Vision Statement be reduced to just the first paragraph and first two <br /> sentences of the second paragraph,followed by a new statement that acknowledges the <br /> varying character of the nine sites in order to set an appropriate tone for success without <br /> prescribing a specific formula that must apply to all of these disparate properties. <br /> "The livability of these development sites is paramount. These future developments address <br /> housing needs for families of all incomes and ages,and also provide a supply of workforce <br /> housing in the City to accommodate mandated regional Housing Need Allocations by the State <br /> of California. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.