My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
051512
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2012 11:28:51 AM
Creation date
5/10/2012 3:43:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/10/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
) <br /> Hearing for P11-0731 <br /> Fence between 3647 and 3633 Glacier Ct. North — Baker Talking Points <br /> Prior to construction: We discussed and agreed to each of the following requirements. <br /> Mr. Pretzel's requirements: <br /> I.2x 12 HD baseboards be attached to 4x4 posts on my side. To hold back higher soil level on my side due <br /> to grading for my swimming pool. <br /> 2. Cardboard cones be used to increase the amount of concrete around 4x4 post bases. <br /> Baker requirements. <br /> I. No red paint be applied to new fence wood on Mr. Pretzel's side to avoid bleeding through to my side. <br /> Based on my one requirement Mr. Pretzel said he wished to put up the old painted wood on his side after <br /> the new fence was completed. I agreed. I also agreed to mount the new face boards on my side for his <br /> convenience. <br /> Mr. Pretzel agreed to my requirement not to use any red paint on the new fence. <br /> Mr. Pretzel agreed to reimburse me for half the cost of the new materials. He did. <br /> There was no discussion of, or demand for, a height restriction for the completed fence. <br /> During Construction: <br /> All wood used was redwood. <br /> New fence frame was constructed with 3 instead of 2 2x4 cross members for added strength. <br /> 2x4 blocks were attached to 4x4 posts using galvanized wood screws to support 2x4 cross members for <br /> added strength. <br /> All face boards were attached with galvanized wood screws. <br /> A 4x6 post was used at the street end for added strength for future gate construction. <br /> All labor was performed by me. Construction took a little more than I week. <br /> During construction Mr. Pretzel observed its progress and had no complaints and requested no changes. No <br /> height limits were discussed or requested. <br /> After Construction Completion <br /> The future addition of gates was discussed with Mr. Pretzel. <br /> I advised him that I would be completing my gate after completing concrete work on my side. <br /> After completion of my gate I planned to reduce the height of the two fence sections at the gate end <br /> (approx. 12 ft.)to the same height of the gate. Approx. 6 feet high. <br /> Mr. Pretzel said he agreed with the plan for my gate and was pleased with the completion of the fence as a <br /> whole up to that point. He made no comment on the height of the fence and made no demands to lower it. <br /> A permit application was prepared and submitted to the city planning department. It included sketches of <br /> the fence with dimensions, photos and copies of material receipts. It was signed by myself and Mr. Pretzel <br /> and submitted on 8/31/11. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.