Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 1 <br /> RESOLUTION NO. <br /> A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br /> PLEASANTON DENYING THE APPEAL THEREBY UPHOLDING THE <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF <br /> ROBERT BAKER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW <br /> APPROVAL OF A FENCE GREATER THAN SIX FEET IN HEIGHT, <br /> CASE P11-0731. <br /> WHEREAS, on August 31, 2011, Robert Baker and Carl Pretzel applied for <br /> Administrative Design Review approval for an approximately 74-foot long fence between <br /> their homes at 3647 and 3633 Glacier Court North, varying in height from 72 inches to <br /> 83 inches; and <br /> WHEREAS, zoning for the properties is R-1-6,500 (One — Family Residential) <br /> District; and <br /> WHEREAS, Todd Deike, property owner of 3642 Carlsbad Way, requested a <br /> Zoning Administrator hearing on the subject fence; and <br /> WHEREAS, on October 5, 2011, Carl Pretzel notified staff that he withdrew his <br /> name as the co-applicant of the subject fence, and he now opposes the fence height; <br /> and <br /> WHEREAS, on October 25, 2011, the Zoning Administrator held a public <br /> hearing. After having considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and <br /> recommendations of staff concerning the application, the Zoning Administrator <br /> approved the application, and within the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal <br /> Code, Carl Pretzel submitted an appeal of the decision of the Zoning Administrator; and <br /> WHEREAS, at its meeting of December 14, 2011, the Planning Commission, <br /> after having considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of <br /> City staff concerning the application, denied the appeal, thereby upholding the decision <br /> of the Zoning Administrator; and <br /> WHEREAS, within the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal Code, Carl <br /> Pretzel submitted an appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission; and <br /> WHEREAS, at its meeting of January 10, 2012, the City Council received a <br /> report from the Director of Community Development, together with a copy of the staff <br /> report to the Planning Commission, regarding this matter; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on January 10, 2012, <br /> at which time the appellant, the applicant, and any other members of the public were <br /> offered an opportunity to present evidence regarding this appeal; and <br /> 1 <br />