21 - Laserfiche WebLink

David Stark, 4072 Cid Way — noted that as a past member of the Housing Commission he had noted differences between the two Commissions. He commented on the workload of the commissions is tied to the current political environment and noted that combining the commissions would likely mean less work for staff. If the Commissions agreed to the merge, Mr. Stark urged that members of the commission with specific skills be given designated items to cover to increase the efficiency in dealing with a broader range of issues. He also suggested that, if the two commissions are combined, members of the new commission should be required to participate in some type of training to development enhanced "meeting management skills." Howard Neely, Kottinger Drive —thought combining the two commissions made some sense and agreed with Mr. Stark's analogy. He thought a five member Commission would be sufficient with a Task Force also being put in place to work on specific issues or projects. Chairperson Lopez closed the meeting for public comment at 8:50 p.m. Commissioner Casey indicated he wanted to be on record as opposing any further discussions regarding the proposed merger of the Human Services and Housing Commissions. He noted that the Housing Commission had worked with the Human Services Commission on streamlining the grant process, but was not sure that anything else would be beneficial and felt that joint workshops would have taken place if there had been any benefit. Commissioner Casey was unsure about the amount of staff time that would be reduced by combining the commissions and was concerned about reducing community involvement by eliminating commission positions. He did not feel that Human Services and Housing needs blended well together and was concerned about how a merger would affect work necessary for the Housing Element. Commissioner Hempill referenced Attachment 2 and suggested item 5-6 on the duties document should include something about Housing and Human Services, and indicated that items 7-8 and 8-9 were identical. She also thought having a combined commission of seven members would offer more diversity and training would be important. Commissioner Hempill was in favor of continuing the review process. Commissioner Probed was concerned about the length of meetings and the prep time required for the meetings. He indicated that he echoed Commissioner Casey's comments and felt that the grant process was only one distinct area of collaboration between the two commissions, and did not see any synergy elsewhere. Commissioner Probed was concerned that Housing would become a subcommittee of Human Services. Commissioner Casey indicated that if the action is for the process to continue he would favor Option 1 with the suggestion that all current commissioners be terminated and the Mayor and Council would appoint new commissioners as appropriate, including any existing commissioners who wished to serve on the new commission. Page - 2 -