Laserfiche WebLink
HOUSING ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS/ GROWTH MANAGEMENT <br /> REVIEW <br /> The Housing Element Goals, Policies and Programs include about thirty new programs <br /> that will be implemented over the next two years. Two of these programs will have <br /> bearing on the impact of future multifamily residential projects. <br /> Program 9.8 of the Housing Element Goals, Policies and Programs calls for the <br /> preparation of Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines that will <br /> guide the development of the nine recently rezoned housing sites (Sites 1 through 9 in <br /> Table 1). The standards would create rules for height, massing, setbacks, landscaping, <br /> number of parking spaces, open spaces, building types and architecture. The intent is <br /> to promote high quality living environments that are compatible with Pleasanton's <br /> existing neighborhoods. The City will be hosting two workshops in April and May to <br /> discuss the draft document with the community. <br /> Since 1978 the City has maintained a Growth Management Ordinance/program <br /> designed to provide guidelines for pacing the rate of construction (i.e., issuance of <br /> building permits) for approved residential development to achieve a predicable growth <br /> rate to alleviate the potential for strain on city resources and infrastructure. Program 9.1 <br /> of the recently adopted Housing Element calls for a review, and if necessary, an <br /> amendment to the City's Growth Management Ordinance to assure that the rate of <br /> residential development is consistent with the City's current and new infrastructure <br /> capacities, including roadways, water, sewer and facilities, etc. The objective of this <br /> program is to assure that the ordinance is consistent with State law and that there is a <br /> procedure for assuring available infrastructure to serve future new development. <br /> Program 29.2 also calls for a review of the Growth Management Ordinance to reflect <br /> current housing need and infrastructure conditions and to assure that it does not include <br /> constraints that would prevent the City from meeting its share of the regional housing <br /> need. To address these programs, the City Council formed a subcommittee with <br /> councilmembers Thorne and McGovern for the purpose of leading this review effort. <br /> The subcommittee has met on a number of occasions and on March 20, 2012 it <br /> presented a report (Attachment 2) to the City Council outlining the results of its work to <br /> date that includes framing six growth management objectives for consideration and <br /> feedback. <br /> Fundamental to the objectives outlined in the March 20 report is the potential for <br /> establishing a graduated point system that could be used to develop priorities for <br /> determining an order for the issuance of building permits. The point system could take <br /> into account items such as proposed infrastructure improvements, development design <br /> quality, project amenities, sustainability/ green technologies, affordable housing, and <br /> overall impacts. Also included as a factor to consider could be the adequacy of school <br /> facilities. Based on this system, those projects with the highest number of total points <br /> would be eligible for building permits before developments with lower point totals. This <br /> system would most likely result in the City, through a biannual growth management <br /> report, assessing infrastructure which includes school facilities, conditions and capacity. <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />