My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
041712
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2012 11:45:27 AM
Creation date
4/12/2012 11:45:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/17/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> The weed abatement program, provided in Government Code sections 39560 — 39588, <br /> established a mechanism for assuring the removal of weeds, dirt, rubbish and refuse on <br /> specified properties that constitutes a public nuisance. All of the owners of properties <br /> included in the attached Exhibit A have been mailed a Notice to abate the nuisance on <br /> their parcels which included the public hearing date. In cases where there was an <br /> insufficient mailing address, the notice was posted conspicuously on the property. Each <br /> notice was sent with a list of weed abatement standards. A proof of service was <br /> completed by the Fire Department for our files to certify what documents were sent to the <br /> property owners. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> At this hearing, after considering any objections to the proposed abatement, the City <br /> Council should overrule the objections to the proposed abatement and/or amend the list <br /> of properties to be abated. The City Council should then adopt the attached resolution, <br /> as amended (if at all), that orders a contractor to abate the weeds on the properties <br /> attached in Exhibit A. <br /> After this hearing, Fire Inspectors will re-survey each parcel listed for compliance. If <br /> abatement has not occurred by May 31, 2012, a contractor will abate the weeds. At a <br /> public hearing this summer, staff will recommend that the City Council order that the <br /> abatement costs be a special assessment and lien imposed on the properties requiring <br /> abatement for any outstanding invoices. <br /> Submitted by / Fiscal Review: Approve by: <br /> 41111 _ 4,11r- 'rtitt:e:tvits NV <br /> Ji1iguel I Emily E. Wagner Nelson Fialho <br /> Chief Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Attachments: <br /> 1. Resolution <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.