08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Operation and Maintenance Services of Sewer and Water Systems Bidders are advised that in the evaluation of cost it will be assumed that the unit price quoted is correct in the case of a discrepancy between the unit price and an extension. As a result of this RFP, the County intends to award a contract to the responsible bidder(s) whose response conforms to the RFP and whose bid presents the greatest value to the County, all evaluation criteria considered. The combined weight of the evaluation criteria is greater in importance than cost in determining the greatest value to the County. The goal is to award a contract to the bidder(s) that proposes the County the best quality as determined by the combined weight of the evaluation criteria. The County may award a contract of higher qualitative competence over the lowest priced response. The basic information that each section should contain is specified below, these specifications should be considered as minimum requirements. Much of the material needed to present a comprehensive proposal can be placed into one of the sections listed. However, other criteria may be added to further support the evaluation process whenever such additional criteria are deemed appropriate in considering the nature of the goods and/or services being solicited. Each of the following Evaluation Criteria below will be used in ranking and determining the quality of bidders' proposals. Proposals will be evaluated according to each Evaluation Criteria, and scored on a five-point scale. The scores for all the Evaluation Criteria will then be added according to their assigned weight (below) to arrive at a weighted score for each proposal. A proposal with a high weighted total will be deemed of higher quality than a proposal with a lesser-weighted total. The final maximum score for any project is five hundred fifty (550) points including local and small and local or emerging and local preference points. The evaluation process may include a two-stage approach including an initial evaluation of the written proposal and preliminary scoring to develop a short list of bidders that will continue to the final stage of oral presentation and interview and reference checks. The preliminary scoring will be based on the total points, excluding points allocated to references, oral presentation, and interview. If the two-stage approach is used, the three (3) bidders receiving the highest preliminary scores and with at least 200 points will be invited to an oral presentation and interview. Only the bidders meeting the short list criteria will proceed to the next stage. All other bidders will be deemed eliminated from the process. All bidders will be notified of the short list participants; however, the preliminary scores at that time will not be communicated to bidders. The zero to five-point scale range is defined as follows: 0 Not Acceptable Non-responsive, fails to meet RFP specification. The approach has no probability of success. If a mandatory requirement this Page 15 of 29