Laserfiche WebLink
October 21, 2011 <br /> Debra Kaufman <br /> Senior Program Manager <br /> StopWaste.org <br /> 1537 Webster Street <br /> Oakland, CA 94612 <br /> Dear Ms. Kaufman: <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to review the draft ordinance requiring action to reduce <br /> landfilling of recyclable and organic solid wastes from business, multi-family residences, and <br /> self haulers and the draft ordinance regulating the use of carryout bags and promoting the use <br /> of recyclable bags. We have completed our review and our comments are listed below. <br /> Comments concerning the ordinance requiring actions to reduce landfilling of recyclable and <br /> organic solid wastes from businesses, multi-family residences,and self-haulers <br /> 1. Adoption of the ordinance may lead to service cost increases for Pleasanton Garbage <br /> commercial and multi-family customers and users of the Pleasanton Transfer Station. <br /> While we have reviewed the Authority's economic analysis indicating that the ordinance will <br /> actually result in reduced collection costs,that analysis focuses on existing collection rate tiers <br /> that pass the cost of recycling programs to other collection tiers, and not the actual cost of <br /> providing the services. Because the proposed ordinance requires mandatory material <br /> separation,the cost of containers, bins,trucks and sorting services will be borne by either <br /> commercial and multi-family residential customers or spread over other collection tiers. In <br /> addition, because many residents using the transfer station will not have the capacity to source <br /> separate, requiring separate loads or containers,the 50%surcharge included in Section 6(b), <br /> represents a significant increase to our multi-family residents. We request additional analysis <br /> detailing actual costs of providing the services within each community. <br /> The HF&H report is based on costs of providing services, not existing rates, on a Countywide <br /> average basis. The HF&H report does not show lower collection costs, but rather lower overall <br /> system costs, when all major costs are considered (collecting, processing, disposal). HF&H <br /> found that collecting,transporting and processing recvclables and compostables,that would <br /> result from a mandatory recycling ordinance,would result in a lower net cost than collecting, <br /> transporting and disposing of that amount of solid waste as garbage, given avoided landfill <br /> disposal costs, commodity values for recyclables and higher efficiencies for organics collection. <br />